WRITING EXPERTISE AND SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY
By Alister H Cumming. 1989
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Sasaki
- Shih-Chieh Chien
- Julian McAuley
- Jure Leskovec
- Abdul Rahman Awadh Al Asmari
- Paul Thompson
- C. Tardy
- Hiroe Kobayashi
Citations in the corpus
- From amateurs to connoisseurs: modeling the evolution of user expertise through online reviews (2013, background): “‘Expertise’ has been studied from the perspective of linguistic development [34], for example in the context of second-language acquisition [8, 36].”
- Investigation of Writing Strategies, Writing Apprehension, and Writing Achievement among Saudi EFL-Major Students (2013, background): “…performed better in the language achievement assignment given to them (e.g. Hayes & Flower, 1983; Hayes, Flower, Shriver, Stratman, & Carey, 1987; Cumming, 1989; Sasaki, 2000; Graham & Perin, 2006; Anson, 2006; Kobayashi & Rinnert, 2008; Lei, 2008; Kırmızı, 2009, Erkan, & Saban, 2011; Mahnam, &…”
- Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment (2009, background): “A number of studies of writing process have found that writers’ experience impacts their process, when reading is included (Cumming, 1989) and when it is not (Sasaki, 2000).”
- Written Narratives as an Index of L2 Competence in Korean EFL Learners. (2005, background): “One way of examining discourse competence in the use of formal linguistic devices is proposed by Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) taxonomy of cohesive devices.”
- Teaching and Researching Genre Knowledge: Toward an Enhanced Theoretical Framework (2020, background): “Language scholars have argued that there is underlying knowledge accessible across languages (Cumming, 1989, in press; Cummins, 1979; Gentil, 2011, 2018; Rinnert & Kobayashi, 2016).”
- THE BEST OF TWO APPROACHES: PROCESS/ GENRE- BASED APPROACH TO TEACHING WRITING (2017, background): “Hence, as noted by researchers like Cumming (1998) and Matsuda (1999), L2 practitioners are still in search of a coherent, comprehensive theory of the teaching of writing.”
- A Temporal Analysis of Formulation Processes in L1 and L2 Writing. (2001, background): “, rehearsing for compensatory reasons (Arndt, 1987; Raimes, 1985, 1987), translating (Cumming, 1989; Swain & Lapkin, 1995; Whalen, 1993; Whalen & Ménard, 1995), generating and assessing lexical alternatives (Bosher,1998; Cumming, 1989; Krings, 1994; Swain & Lapkin, 1995; Zimmermann, 2000), or feelin”
- Toward an Empirical Model of EFL Writing Processes: An Exploratory Study (2000, methodology): “Furthermore, if writing expertise is a type of intelligence as Cumming (1989) speculated, we must expect a great amount of individual difference in its development in response to various types of instruction (Gardner, 1983).”
- Written discourse development in CLIL at secondary school (2011, background): “There is agreement as to transfer of writing (and reading) ability from L1 to L2 (Cumming, 1994), but, as Manchón’s studies have shown (e.”
- Japanese Learners' Self Revisions and Peer Revisions of Their Written Compositions in English. (2008, methodology): “Cumming (1990) and Swain and Lapkin have suggested that writers’ engagement in verbal and mental negotiations while they compose or revise texts may facilitate their L2 learning while they compose.”