Japanese Learners' Self Revisions and Peer Revisions of Their Written Compositions in English.

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Immediate and delayed effects of embedded metacognitive instruction on Chinese EFL students’ English writing and regulation of cognition (2016, background): “There is ample evidence for supporting peer-correction in writing (Suzuki, 2008; Yang, 2011).”
A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback (2010, background): “Nonetheless, whether these quality-enhancing revisions were due to the trained peer review itself or to students’ self-revision during the writing process is not fully understood (Min; Suzuki, 2008).”
Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014) (2016, methodology): “should be integrated into the L2 writing classroom (e.g. Matsuno 2007; Suzuki 2008; Birjandi & Tamjid 2012; Lam 2013).”
Free from demotivation in EFL writing: the use of online flipped writing instruction (2020, result): “Such findings were in line with previous studies that online interaction and peer feedback enhanced EFL learner English writing proficiency (Lin & Chien, 2009; Lundstrom & Baker, 2009; Suzuki, 2008) and motivation (Ismail, 2006; Purnell & Paulanka, 2003).”