Situational judgment tests: A review of recent research

By Filip Lievens, Helga Peeters, Eveline Schollaert. 2008

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to give an empirically‐based review of the strengths and weaknesses of situational judgment tests (SJTs).Design/methodology/approach – The features, history, and development of SJTs are discussed. Next, a computerized search (from 1990‐2007) is conducted to retrieve empirical studies related to SJTs. The effectiveness of SJTs is discussed in terms of reliability, criterion‐related validity, incremental validity, construct‐related validity, utility, adverse impact, applicant perceptions, fakability, and susceptibility to practice and coaching effects.Findings – Strengths of SJTs are that they show criterion‐related validity and incremental validity above cognitive ability and personality tests. SJTs have also less adverse impact towards minorities (especially if the cognitive loading of the SJT is low). Furthermore, applicant reactions towards SJTs are positive and SJTs enable to test large applicant groups at once (through the Internet). In terms of weaknesses, SJTs ...

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c8d280b442f1aaaf8dfb00c0603c0121875c8a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

  1. William I. MacKenzie
  2. Robert E. Ployhart
  3. L. Kim
  4. C. MacCann
  5. M. C. Campion
  6. Michael S. Cole
  7. Claire S. Johnston

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

  1. William I. MacKenzie
  2. M. C. Campion
  3. Robert E. Ployhart

In Surgery

  1. William I. MacKenzie
  2. Robert E. Ployhart
  3. M. C. Campion

Citations in the corpus