Does Work–Home Interference mediate the relationship between workload and well-being?
By S. Geurts, Michiel A. J. Kompier, Susan J. Roxburgh, Irene Houtman. 2003
302 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88f28ec972a6848253a64c996d9497fd9b7bf87c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Ulla Kinnunen *
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Daantje Derks
- Toon W. Taris
- S. Geurts
In Sociology and Political Science
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Daantje Derks
- Toon W. Taris
- Ulla Kinnunen *
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- S. Geurts
Citations in the corpus
- Dimensions of work–home culture and their relations with the use of work–home arrangements and work–home interaction (2007, result): “Similar and even higher figures have been reported for Dutch employees (Geurts, Kompier, Roxburgh, & Houtman, 2003 ) and for the Canadian work force (Duxbury & Higgins, 2001 ).”
- Recovery opportunities, work – home interference, and well-being among managers (2006, background): “, when workers experience difficulty relaxing) due to a slow process of unwinding (Geurts et al., 2003; Sluiter et al., 2001; Sonnentag, 2001).”
- Gender Differences in Work-Family Guilt in Parents of Young Children (2017, background): “Moreover, across multiple cultural contexts, both types of work-family conflict are associated with experiencingmore negative emotions, such as anxiety, tension, worry, frustration, guilt, and distress among men and women (Frone et al. 1997; Geurts et al. 2003; Livingston and Judge 2008; Shaw and Bu”
- Switching on and off … : Does smartphone use obstruct the possibility to engage in recovery activities? (2014, methodology): “Work–home interference was measured using the eight-item subscale of the SWING (Survey Work– home Interaction NijmeGen; Geurts et al., 2005).”
- Social support (family and supervisor), work–family conflict, and burnout: Sex differences (2012, background): “…between work support and work strain outcomes have been largely drawn from models with the WFC antecedents specified as proximal predictors (Ford et al., 2005; Geurts et al., 2003; Janssen et al., 2004; Judge and Colquitt, 2004; Mauno et al., 2005; Thomas and Ganster, 1995; Voydanoff, 2005).”
- Supportive supervisors improve employees' daily lives: The role supervisors play in the impact of daily workload on life satisfaction via work–family conflict (2015, background): “…employees' family lives and relationships (Eby, Casper, Lockwood, Bordeaux, & Brinley, 2005) as well as affective and health-related indicators of well-being (Geurts et al., 2003), less is known about how these processes unfold and the effects on employees' general well-being or life satisfaction.”
- Work-home interaction from a work psychological perspective: Development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING (2005, background): “work) (Geurts & Demerouti, 2003 ; Geurts, Kompier, Roxburgh, & Houtman, 2003 ; Van Hooff et al, 2005 ).”
- Work hours and well-being: The roles of work-time control and work–family interference (2007, methodology): “The effort-recovery (E-R) model (Meijman & Mulder, 1998 ) has been used in recent studies to explain the mediating role of WIF in the relationship between work characteristics (eg, work hours and job demands) and well-being (eg, Geurts, Kompier, Roxburgh, & Houtman, 2003 ; Janssen, Peeters, de Jon”
- Does work–family conflict mediate the relationship between job schedule demands and burnout in male construction professionals and managers? (2005, background): “( 2003 ) identify the lack of a strong conceptual framework as a limitation in many empirical studies.”