Coaching at the heart of managerial effectiveness: A cross-cultural study of managerial behaviours

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Behavioural indicators of ineffective managerial coaching: a cross-national study. (2008, background): “While some recent research efforts have begun to establish a more robust base of literature on effective (positive) managerial coaching behaviours ( Hamlin et al. , 2006”
Organizational investments in social capital, managerial coaching, and employee work-related performance (2011, background): “Managerial coaching behaviors identified in the aforementioned studies are largely consistent and research suggests that managerial coaching is the heart of managerial effectiveness (Hamlin et al., 2006).”
Managerial Coaching (2014, background): “(R. S. Beattie, 2002, p. 412) A summary of two different perspectives of behavior identified by Hamlin et al. (2006), interpersonal and cognitive, are summarized in Table 1.”
Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention (2018, unknown): “It has been suggested that supervisory coaching is at ‘ the heart of managerial and leadership e ﬀ ectiveness ’ (Hamlin, Ellinger, and Beattie.”