Metamemory: Theory and data.

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Interleaving Helps Students Distinguish among Similar Concepts (2012, background): “These kinds of poor metacognitive judgments have been demonstrated many times (e.g., Dunlosky and Lipko 2007; McCabe 2011; Metcalfe 2000).”
Metacognition and consciousness. (2007, unknown): “Experimental paradigms in the study of online metamemory A variety of metacognitive judgments have been studied in recent years, which ought to be included under the umbrella of metacognition (Metcalfe, 2000).”
Metacognition and Affect: What Can Metacognitive Experiences Tell Us about the Learning Process?. (2006, background): “1 For the importance of accessibility as a cue in metacognitive judgments see Koriat (1997) and Metcalfe (2000) and also Kahneman (2003).”
The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy (2006, background): “…research in monitoring has primarily been limited to studying the relationship between monitoring judgments and performance outcomes on objective assessments of recently studied material (for reviews of this literature, see Dunlosky, 2004; Metcalfe, 2000; and Schneider & Pressley, 1997, Chapter 6).”