Response Rates in Organizational Science, 1995–2008: A Meta-analytic Review and Guidelines for Survey Researchers

422 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Proactive CSR: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of its Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions on the Association between Capabilities and Performance (2013, methodology): “Given that the overall response rate was lower than might be expected (Anseel et al., 2010), the possibility of non-response bias was examined through Armstrong and Overton’s (1977) time-trend extrapolation procedure.”
The effect of psychological capital on conflicts in the work–family interface, turnover and absence intentions (2014, background): “Such gap is observed in Avey et al.’s (2011) meta-analytic tudy that has examined a limited number of studies regarding he effect of PsyCap on employee attitudes and behaviors.”
The “Quick Start Guide” for Conducting and Publishing Longitudinal Research (2011, methodology): “With respect to reducing missing data, all of the best practices of research design are still relevant (see Anseel et al. 2010, for several excellent recommendations).”
When passion fades: disentangling the temporal dynamics of entrepreneurial passion for founding (2016, background): “The use of response-enhancing strategies such as personalization, advanced notice and network sponsorship (Anseel et al., 2010) yielded a relatively high response rate; of the 511 entrepreneurs invited at T1, 274 responded (response rate: 53.6 per cent).”