Positive affectivity: The disposition to experience pleasurable emotional states
By D. Watson. 2002
190 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80de9630e355aa7793d554bc568cbc8e684f9ba0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- K. Kristjánsson
- Blake E. Ashforth
- Glen E. Kreiner
- Vikas Anand
- Blaine Landis
- N. Fagley
- Anne M. O'Leary-Kelly
- Stefano Tasselli
Citations in the corpus
- An application of item response theory to psychological test development (2016, unknown): “Conversely, those persons with high levels of negative affect experience repeated episodes of intense displeasure (Watson, 2005).”
- Explaining Vigor: On the Antecedents and Consequences of Vigor as a Positive Affect at Work (2007, background): “Vigor, like most other positive affects, facilitates goal-directed behavior (Carver and Scheier, 1990) or approach behavior (Fredrickson, 2002; Watson, 2002) and therefore could be expected to prompt individuals to engage with their job and work environment.”
- TOWARD A THEORY OF ETHICAL AND SPIRITUAL WELL-BEING, AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY THROUGH SPIRITUAL LEADERSHIP (2005, background): “…of such mental/psychological indicators as positive affect, frustration, stress, and anxiety as they impact such physiological indicators as blood pressure, heart condition, and general physical health (Dana & Griffin, 1999; Kaczorowski, 1989; Quick, Nelson, & Hurrell, 1997; Watson, 2001).”
- Positive Psychology and Positive Education: Old Wine in New Bottles? (2012, background): “In general, greater emphasis must be placed on learning by doing, Deweyan style, as more gratification and less proneness to mind-wandering tends to be obtained through physical activities than mere thinking (Watson, 2005).”
- The Negative Side of Positive Psychology (2004, background): “For example, in the Handbook, Carver and Scheier (2002) and Watson (2002) speak of the possibility of changing those with negative temperaments (whether caused by genes,early environment, or both).”
- Personality Change: Implications for Organizational Behavior (2018, background): “The focus of positive psychology tends to be on doing rather than thinkingor talking as away to enact personality change (Watson, 2002).”
- Appreciation: individual differences in finding value and meaning as a unique predictor of subjective well-being. (2005, background): “Watson (2002) reviewed evidence regarding independence and concluded that there is little correlation between positive and negative affect.”
- Integrating positive psychology into schools: Implications for practice (2004, background): “Stable individual differences in the experience of positive emotions are described as positive affectivity (Watson, 2002).”
- Burnout and engagement: A South African perspective (2003, background): “These constructs include resilience (Masten & Reed, 2002), flow (Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi, 2002), positive affectivity (Watson, 2002), coping strategies (Stanton, Parsa & Austenfeld, 2002) and emotional intelligence (Salovey, Mayer & Caruso, 2002).”
- Validation of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ) in Taiwanese Undergraduate Students (2009, unknown): “2008), and positive affectivity (Watson 2002).”
- Extending the expanded model of organizational identification to occupations (2013, background): “Individuals predisposed to positive affective states are more inclined to perceive social objects—presumably including occupations—in a positive or optimistic light (Watson, 2002).”
- Vigor as a Positive Affect at Work: Conceptualizing Vigor, Its Relations with Related Constructs, and Its Antecedents and Consequences (2011, background): “Still, it is quite possible that there are innate, genotypic differences that antecede phenotypic variations in vigor (Watson, 2002).”