Vigor as a Positive Affect at Work: Conceptualizing Vigor, Its Relations with Related Constructs, and Its Antecedents and Consequences
By A. Shirom. 2011
243 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e3828eda50282654d0cd368c1e79a5b8cef07e92
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- M. Westman
- Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben
- Jean-Pierre Neveu
- Toon W. Taris
- Osman M. Karatepe
In Social Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben
- M. Westman
- Jean-Pierre Neveu
- Osman M. Karatepe
- Sabine Sonnentag
In Sociology and Political Science
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben
- M. Westman
- Jean-Pierre Neveu
- Anouk Decuypere
- Stevan E. Hobfoll
Citations in the corpus
- Psychosocial safety climate moderating the effects of daily job demands and recovery on fatigue and work engagement (2014, background): “One possible explanation is thatworker affectwas impacted by perceptions ofmanagement care towards staffmentalwell-being,with flow-on effects tomental health (Shirom, 2011), although affect was not measured in this study.”
- Let’s Focus on Solutions to Entrepreneurial Ill-Being! Recovery Interventions to Enhance Entrepreneurial Well-Being (2021, background): “Feelings of vitality, in turn, are associated with short- term gains in workplace creativity (Kark & Carmeli, 2009) and performance (Shirom, 2011), along with longer- term considerations such as increased lifespans (Chida & Steptoe, 2008), and greater durability when faced with diseases (Muraven et…”
- Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences (2018, background): “Thus, a process that is initiated at the dyadic level may lead to a spiral from one individual to his or her partner and from both of them to their respective team members, potentially leading to what is described as an engaged organization (Westman 2001) or a vigorous organization (Shirom 2011).”
- From strengths use to work performance: The role of harmonious passion, subjective vitality, and concentration (2014, background): “…their strengths would perform better, as the heightened feelings of energy and aliveness would enable them to work harder and for longer periods of time, to engage in more creative and proactive behaviors, and to better adapt to change (Carmeli et al., 2009; Salanova et al., 2005; Shirom, 2011).”
- The Two Dimensions of Motivation and a Reciprocal Model of the Creative Process (2013, background): “…in driving persistence and productivity is Carmeli et al.’s (2012) finding that the relationship between generosity and creativity is explained by increased vigor, defined as a set of related affective states involving physical strength, emotional energy, and cognitive liveliness (Shirom, 2011).”
- Daily within-person effects of job autonomy and work engagement on innovative behaviour: The cross-level moderating role of creative self-efficacy (2017, background): “As noted by Shirom (2011), the vigour component of work engagement conceptually overlaps with resilience.”
- Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms (2020, background): “Hence, we propose that leader behavior infused with positive leader emotions, for example, as a consequence of leader work engagement (Shirom, 2011), leader psychological need satisfaction (Deci and Ryan, 2000), or positive interactions with employees (Gooty et al., 2019), is contagious and…”
- Is Materialism All That Bad? Effects on Satisfaction with Material Life, Life Satisfaction, and Economic Motivation (2013, background): “There is some evidence suggesting that happy people tend to experience more vigor, physical strength, emotional energy, and cognitive liveliness than unhappy people (Shirom 2011).”