Extending the expanded model of organizational identification to occupations
By Blake E. Ashforth, Mahendra Joshi, Vikas Anand, Anne M. O'Leary-Kelly. 2013
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ea1ba098098f65e3f4b6d2de0f7398b49c3ec05
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- D. Miščenko
- Blake E. Ashforth
- Kristie M. Rogers
- Michael G. Pratt
- D. Day
- Allan Lee
- B. Erdogan
- Camille Pradies
In Sociology and Political Science
- Blake E. Ashforth
- Kristie M. Rogers
- D. Day
- D. Miščenko
- Camille Pradies
- Michael G. Pratt
- A. Tian
- Allan Lee
Citations in the corpus
- Identity and identification at work (2016, background): “Recently, Ashforth et al. (2013) proposed to extend the expanded model of organizational identification to occupations by empirically differentiating occupational, ambivalent, and neutral identification, as well as disidentification.”
- Ambivalence in Organizations: A Multilevel Approach (2014, background): “And Ashforth et al. (2013) find that role conflict experienced by telemarketers is associated with ambivalence toward their occupation.”
- Perceived overqualification and task performance: Reconciling two opposing pathways (2020, methodology): “Occupational instrumentality refers to the perception that one’s job is a stepping stone to future career opportunities (Ashforth et al., 2013).”