Avoiding Bias in Publication Bias Research: The Value of “Null” Findings

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Beyond cold technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis on emotions in technology-based learning environments (2018, background): “…mean effects for the eight aforementioned relations ranged from 0.01 to 0.04, indicating that publication bias could be present under these conditions, although the effects would likely be only small to moderate, and conclusions would not be substantially altered (Kepes, Banks, & Oh, 2014).”
What does team–member exchange bring to the party? A meta‐analytic review of team and leader social exchange (2014, background): “Large changes in the effect size estimates are said to provide evidence of publication bias (Kepes et al., 2012).”
Understanding the Program Effectiveness of Early Mathematics Interventions for Prekindergarten and Kindergarten Environments: A Meta-Analytic Review (2016, methodology): “, 2005), or a scatterplot of the magnitude of effect sizes against the standard error, to determine initial evidence of publication bias by looking for an asymmetrical distribution of studies around the mean effect size (Kepes et al., 2014).”
How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology? (2013, background): “However, analogous recommendations apply to review articles, particularly meta-analytic (systematic) reviews (Kepes et al., 2013).”