Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model

By Paul Tracey, Nelson Phillips, Owen Jarvis. Organ. Sci., 2011

994 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d92b006ed752a0ec7f951519207d5963bf9fd7d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Entrepreneurship in Regulated Markets: Framing Contests and Collective Action to Introduce Pay TV in the U.S. (2014, result): “Our study follows earlier attempts (e.g. Hargadon and Douglas, 2001, Pacheco et al, 2010; Phillips & Tracey, 2007, Tracey et al., 2011) to establish a link between entrepreneurship and institutional entrepreneurship, where the latter is defined a la Aldrich (2011) through collective action but…”
Sustaining Inter-organizational Relationships Across Institutional Logics and Power Asymmetries: The Case of Fair Trade (2016, background): “…or field cope with the presence at the macro-level of conflicting institutional logics (see, for example, Guston’s 2001 work on ‘boundary organizations’) or how they synthesize logics into new organizational forms or field-level rationales for action (Rao and Gorgi 2006; Tracey et al. 2011).”
Institutional work: Taking stock and making it matter (2017, background): “…continuously recalibrating the relationship between existing logics (Bjerregaard & Jonasson, 2014; Empson et al., 2013; Smets & Jarzabkowski, 2013; Tracey et al., 2010) These studies highlight two important, broader phenomena within institutional work research at the organization-level: first,…”
Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing (2017, background): “Such interactions can be between powerful ‘structural actors’ (e.g. regulators, public service commissioners, large enterprises) as well as less powerful entrepreneurial actors who nevertheless are able to introduce and enlist support for innovative ideas (Tracey et al., 2011).”
Green entrepreneurship in the sharing economy: utilising multiplicity of institutional logics (2019, background): “…through integrating institutional logics from different domains is well-demonstrated as a viable strategy for organisational accomplishments (Scott 2001; Battilana and Dorado 2010; Bjerregaard and Jonasson 2013; Jay 2013; Pache and Santos 2013; Tracey et al. 2011; McPherson and Sauder 2013).”
A Fair Trade-off? Paradoxes in the Governance of Fair-trade Social Enterprises (2016, background): “…searching for the positive (Parkinson and Howorth, 2008) and in response more recent research has advanced new theories to explain their emergence (Tracey et al. 2011), management (Battilana and Dorado 2010; Pache and Santos 2012) and, more critically, the ethics, power and emancipatory aspects…”
Social Entrepreneurship in Non-munificent Institutional Environments and Implications for Institutional Work: Insights from China (2017, neutral): “Such creation of a new organizational form underpinned by a new set of logics requires institutional work at micro-, meso- and macro-levels (Tracey et al. 2011).”
Beyond the Moral Portrayal of Social Entrepreneurs: An Empirical Approach to Who They Are and What Drives Them (2016, background): “According to Trevino (1986), ‘ethical decision-making’ yields social consequences in the areas of health, safety, or employee welfare.”
Institutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel’s Transformation to Platform Leader (2013, background): “More recent research on institutional logics has also recognized organizational identity as an essential constituent of institutional logics (Greenwood, Díaz, Li & Lorente, 2010; Thornton & Ocasio, 2008; Tracey, Phillips & Jarvis, 2011).”
Beyond Constraining and Enabling: Toward New Microfoundations for Institutional Theory (2017, neutral): “In fact, in studies at the individual (Creed, DeJordy, & Lok, 2010; Lok, 2010) and organizational (Pache & Santos, 2010; Tracey, Phillips, & Jarvis, 2011) levels of analysis, as well as at multiple levels (Besharov & Smith, 2014), researchers tend to assume that logics are reflectively managed, and…”
Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda (2014, background): “…(Parkinson and Howorth 2008; Sepulveda et al. 2013) and, in response, more recent research has advanced new theories to explain their emergence (Tracey et al. 2011), management (Battilana and Dorado 2010; Pache and Santos 2011) and, more critically, the ethics, power and emancipatory aspects…”
Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framework and a Research Agenda (2012, background): “Are maverick individuals who refuse to accept institutional and resource constraints the engine of growth (e.g., Halme et al., 2012 (this issue); Tracey et al., 2011)?”
Bankers at the gate: Microfinance and the high cost of borrowed logics (2012, background): “Tracey et al. (2011) describe institutional entrepreneurship as a multi-level phenomenon that includes political processes and production or alteration of meaning systems by actors (individual or collective) seeking to change or create new institutions.”