Methods of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Organizational Research
380 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bdfeb2477e8887ec787f0b00e9be05b11f38b65
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Sabine Sonnentag
- H. Zacher
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Adam M. Grant
- R. Ilies
- Neal M. Ashkanasy
- D. L. Ferris
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- H. Zacher
- R. Ilies
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Brent A. Scott
- Marilyn A. Uy
- Paul Ginns
- Brad A Papworth
- Helen Pluut
In Social Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Adam M. Grant
- R. Ilies
- H. Zacher
- Sharon K. Parker
Citations in the corpus
- Developing and Testing a Dynamic Model of Workplace Incivility Change (2017, result): “%) was lower than those typically reported in studies employing repeated measures designs (Beal & Weiss, 2003), and study participants worked (part-time) for a nonprofit organization.”
- The Hot and Cool of Death Awareness at Work: Mortality Cues, Aging, and Self-Protective and Prosocial Motivations (2009, methodology): “However, because death anxiety is often short-lived, we recommend that researchers utilize experiencesampling (Beal & Weiss, 2003) and daily diary (Kahneman, Krueger, Schkade, Schwarz, & Stone, 2004) methodologies, which are designed to capture brief, momentary psychological states and assess their…”
- The Structure of Affect: Reconsidering the Relationship Between Negative and Positive Affectivity (2003, methodology): “Carried along with this tide have been new research methods, such as ecological momentary assessment (Beal & Weiss, 2002), qualitative inquiry (Rafaeli & Sutton, 1990; Sutton, 1991; Sutton & Rafaeli, 1988), and cross-level analysis (George & Bettenhausen, 1990).”
- Real-time motivation and engagement during a month at school: Every moment of every day for every student matters (2015, background): “In questionnaire studies, responses are subject to retrospection bias (Beal & Weiss, 2003; Clark & Teasdale, 1982; Robinson & Clore, 2002; Stone & Shiffman, 2002) such that individuals' retrospections of their states, experiences, and behaviors are not always reliable depictions of their true…”
- Just Feelings? The Role of Affect in the Formation of Organizational Fairness Judgments (2011, methodology): “In addition to qualitative research, daily experience methods (Beal & Weiss, 2003; Bolger, Davis, & Rafaeli, 2003) seem especially useful for elucidating how affect and experience intertwine over time to create these justice perceptions.”
- Waking Up on the Right or Wrong Side of the Bed: Start-of-Workday Mood, Work Events, Employee Affect, and Performance (2011, background): “Beal and Weiss (2003) argued that even though such aggregation is not ideal, it is sometimes necessary given the models tested.”
- Current Emotion Research in Organizational Behavior (2011, methodology): “…(e.g., Weiss, Nicholas, & Daus, 1999) utilized diary methods, but the approach almost universally employed nowadays is the experience sampling method (ESM; Larson & Csikszentmihalyi, 1983), also known as “ecological momentary assessment” (Beal & Weiss, 2003, p. 440; see also Weiss & Beal, 2005).”
- Within-Person Variability in Job Performance (2014, background): “In the current section, rather than revisit territory already covered by general primers on such research designs (e.g., Beal & Weiss, 2003; Dimotakis & Ilies, 2012), we emphasize the interplay of theory and method.”
- The effect of positive work reflection during leisure time on affective well-being: Results from three diary studies (2016, methodology): “We also included ‘day of study’ in the model to control for time trends in the data (e.g., Beal & Weiss, 2003; Bolger & Laurenceau, 2013).”
- Scientific Contributions of Within-Person Research in Management: Making the Juice Worth the Squeeze (2018, background): “…daily life (Kahneman, Krueger, Schkade, Schwarz, & Stone, 2004: 1777), these within-person studies have been labeled ecological momentary assessment (Beal & Weiss, 2003), event sampling (Elfering et al., 2005), diary studies (Heller & Watson, 2005), the daily diary method (Ferris, Spence, Brown,…”
- Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement (2012, background): “First, diary studies eliminate recall biases (Bolger, Davis, & Rafaeli, 2003; Ohly, Sonnentag, Niessen, & Zapf, 2010) because retrospective summaries of individuals’ experiences are often biased by semantic memory (Beal & Weiss, 2003).”