Constructing Genealogies of Teachers' Emotions in Science Teaching.

By Michalinos Zembylas. 2002

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b4f1f0c9173fde8785d9a1ba16c815196a7e232

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

The role of teacher emotions in change: Experiences, patterns and implications for professional development (2013, background): “…different epistemological and theoretical (paradigmatic) approaches- and their accompanying methods or inquiry act as lenses offering diverse views of a complex and multifaceted field (Hargreaves 2005b; Sutton and Wheatley 2003; Schutz and Zembylas 2011; van Veen and Lasky 2005; Zembylas 2002).”
Adult learners’ emotions in online learning (2008, background): “This investigation is grounded in critical and poststructuralist perspectives that allow an appreciation of the learner’s perspective and the construction of emotional knowledge within a particular social terrain (Boler, 1999; Harré, 1986; Zembylas, 2002, 2004, 2005).”
The emotional characteristics of teaching: an ethnographic study of one teacher (2004, unknown): “(Nias, 1996; Zembylas, 2002a).”
The role of emotion in teaching: are there differences between male and female newly qualified teachers’ approaches to teaching? (2009, methodology): “For example, Zembylas (2002, 2005) has shown that the emotions of science teachers influenced how they organised their curriculum and teaching.”
Emotions and confidence within teaching in higher education (2011, background): “There is disagreement about the meaning and nature of ‘emotion’ (see Zembylas 2002).”
Feeling abstinent? Feeling comprehensive? Touching the affects of sexuality curricula (2010, background): “Some exceptions to this general neglect include Boler (1999), Fine ( 1988 ), Hargreaves ( 1998 ) and Zembylas ( 2002 , 2003 ); their bibliographies provide additional work on emotions.”
Teachers’ emotions and professional identity in curriculum reform: A Chinese perspective (2011, background): “As observed by a number of scholars (Hargreaves 1998a, b; Spillane et al. 2002; Zembylas 2002 ), emotion had been one of the most neglected dimensions of research in and practice of educational change for a long time.”
Beyond teacher cognition and teacher beliefs: the value of the ethnography of emotions in teaching (2005, background): “…& Woods, 1996; Kelchtermans, 1996; Little, 1996, 2000; Nias, 1996; Hargreaves, 1998a, 1998b, 2000; Lasky, 2000; Schmidt, 2000; Day & Leitch, 2001; Zembylas, 2002a, 2002b) as a result of paying attention to the way teachers perceive, interpret and evaluate their relationship with the teaching…”
Prospective primary teachers’ self-efficacy and emotions in science teaching (2013, background): “…in science teaching (Barmby and Defty 2006; Bennett et al. 2001; Blalock et al. 2008; Marbá-Tallada and Márquez 2010; Vázquez and Manassero 2007; Zembylas 2002), with recognition of the need to consider the emotions of teachers as a basic aspect inseparable from cognition (Hargreaves 1998,…”
Making sense of the complex entanglement between emotion and pedagogy: contributions of the affective turn (2016, background): “Dado que siempre he afirmado que en el centro de la pedagogía se encuentra la provocación de la emoción y el afecto (por ej., en Zembylas, 2002, 2013a), me parece valioso considerar cómo algunas ideas sobre el giro afectivo pueden enriquecer nuestros intentos por discernir la compleja imbricación…”
Exploring Teacher Emotions: A Literature Review and an Experience Sampling Study (2014, background): “, Darby, 2008; Hargreaves, 2000, 2005; Nias, 1996; Scott & Sutton, 2009; Sutton, 2004; Zembylas, 2004) in order to reconstruct the complex relations between teachers' emotional experiences and their professional self- understanding and identity (e.g., Darby, 2008; Schutz, Cross, Hong, & Osbon, 2007;”
Teacher emotions in the classroom: associations with students’ engagement, classroom discipline and the interpersonal teacher-student relationship (2015, result): “This finding was confirmed in several other studies (Demetriou et al. 2009; Galant 2013; Hargreaves 1998, 2000; Oplatka 2007; Sutton 2007; Williams-Johnson et al. 2008; Zembylas 2002).”