Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures

By Michael G. Jacobides, Thorbjørn Knudsen, Mie Augier. 2006

863 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a037b1afc2feab1b8f9103658b28ba986f03488

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature (2020, neutral): “Choices of firm scope have important implications for both a firm’s power and influence in an ecosystem and for the success of the ecosystem overall (Jacobides, Knudsen, & Augier, 2006; Jacobides, MacDuffie, & Tae, 2016).”
Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators (2008, neutral): “…with surrounding complementors and consumers, the platform owner effectively controls a “bottleneck” essential to other players (Rochet and Tirole 2004; Jacobides et al. 2006).5 Insofar as an MSP represents a scarce, critical asset that facilitates interactions, there will necessarily be an…”
Constructing Markets and Shaping Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Power in Nascent Fields (2009, background): “In this regard, entrepreneurs become active shapers of a new industry architecture by defining boundaries and division of labor ( Jacobides, Knudsen, & Augier, 2006; Ozcan & Eisenhardt, 2009).”
Who Profits from Innovation in Global Value Chains? A Study of the iPod and Notebook PCs (2010, background): “Apple also maintains the role of “guarantor of quality” for its customers (Jacobides et al., 2006), so that few iPod owners are even aware of what microchips power their music player, unlike the “Intel Inside” awareness of the PC market.”
The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View (2008, background): “We briefly discuss four of these questions below, then conclude with a summary of our basic argument.”
Incumbent Performance in the Face of a Radical Innovation: Towards a Framework for Incumbent Challenger Dynamics (2012, background): “Complementary markets Jacobides et al. (2006) Industry ‘architecture’: templates that emerge in a sector and”
Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves (2016, result): “better off allocating a greater proportion of resources towards development of complementary assets rather than in the development of old and new technologies (e.g., Rothaermel and Hill, 2005; Jacobides et al., 2006) Finally, our study provides some useful insights for policy.”
Introduction - Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age (2018, neutral): “This view also has been explored in academic research on the strategic manipulation of ﬁrm boundaries by the surrounding “industry architecture” (Jacobides 2006, Jacobides et al. 2006).”
Intellectual Property Protection and the Formation of Entrepreneurial Growth Aspirations (2010, background): “Finally, strong IPR protection regimes also facilitate industrial specialization (Jacobides et al., 2006).”