From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance Formation

By Lori Rosenkopf, Anca Metiu, Varghese P. George. 2001

348 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77bcb9cd0fce6f79963da86ca7948d80fd4774ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Does familiarity breed trust? Revisiting the antecedents of trust (2008, background): “Although interorganizational relationships become institutionalized over time, these relationships are ultimately supported by sets of activities carried by individual organizational members (Ring and Van de Ven, 1994; Rosenkopf et al., 2001).”
Exploring the Foundations of Cumulative Innovation: Implications for Organization Science (2007, background): “Similarly, innovators within a field may cooperatively establish or revise rules of access to shared technologies or standards by working through alliances or technical standard committees (Rosenkopf et al. 2001, Simcoe 2006).”
The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices (2009, background): “These professions represent a source of information about what is happening across firm boundaries, without the competitive consequences or costs of working with market-based sources such as customers and consultants (Rosenkopf et al., 2001).”
Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects (2015, background): “Firm size is included as multiple studies find that this variable influences collaboration patterns (e.g., ROSENKOPF et al., 2001).”
Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures (2007, background): “…networks begs the questions: at what point, and to what end, do we distinguish the networks of early-stage ventures from those of their founders and key recruits, and how should we think about employees’ professional networks that span fi rm boundaries (e.g., Rosenkopf, Metiu, and George, 2001)?”
The Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Assessment and Prospects (2012, background): “For example, Rosenkopf, Metiu, and George ( 2001 ) examined how joint participation in cooperative technical organizations increased attention to possibilities for alliance formations.”
Standing out from the crowd: the visibility-enhancing effects of IPO-related signals on alliance formation by entrepreneurial firms (2007, background): “…in part on its visibility within the industry, the perception that it has something useful to offer partners and the expectation that the firm will be able to deliver on its commitments in the future (Ahuja, 2000b; Chung et al., 2000; Gulati, 1999, 2007; Rosenkopf et al., 2001; Stuart, 1998).”
Understanding network formation in strategy research: Exponential random graph models (2016, background): “Prior research has highlighted the important role of existing ties among individuals for the subsequent formation of ties between their firms (Gulati and Westphal, 1999; Rosenkopf, Metiu, and George, 2001).”
The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities (2008, background): “If communities are an important vehicle for mediating firm interactions (Rosenkopf et al, 2001) and potentially for innovation outcomes (von Hippel, 2005; Jepperson and Frederiksen, 2006), then understanding such collaborations is crucial to any understanding of that roles that communities play in…”