Adoption of Promising Practices: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

By M. Leseure, Joachim Bauer, Kamaljit S. Birdi, Andy Neely, David Denyer. 2004

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7666cc6fafeab0b80f7cb0a24f6ff2526306b38f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Michael J. Mol
2. Gagan Deep Sharma
3. Julian Birkinshaw
4. M. Hiebl
5. Henk W. Volberda
6. Wendy K. Smith

In Strategy and Management

1. Asha E. Thomas
2. John Bessant
3. Michael J. Mol
4. Elfi Furtmueller
5. Gagan Deep Sharma
6. Julian Birkinshaw
7. Adelien Decramer
8. M. Hiebl

Citations in the corpus

• Innovation Management Measurement: A Review (2006, methodology): “Indeed, this may account for the disappointing outcome in terms of breadth that Leseure et al. (2004) report from their search of electronic databases for literature relating to the adoption of promising practices.”
• Looking for the value of mission statements: a meta‐analysis of 20 years of research (2011, result): “Based on comparable studies ( Leseure et al. , 2004”
• Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021, methodology): “…a structured and transparent examination of the content fit of initially identified research items is the A/B/C logic suggested by Pittaway et al. (2004) and applied similarly in several reviewed articles (e.g., Aguinis et al., 2018; Kauppi et al., 2018; Leseure et al., 2004; Thorpe et al., 2005).”
• The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices (2009, background): “For example, the DTI Innovation Survey and “Porter Report” (published in 2003) highlights the poor adoption of best practices as contributors to the UK's relatively weak productivity levels (Leseure et al., 2004).”
• From Challenges to Creativity: Enhancing SMEs’ Resilience in the Context of COVID-19 (2021, background): “Due to the merits of transparency, replicability, and rigor, this methodology is gaining prominence in social sciences as well [11,12,23,25,26].”
• Achieving Rigor in Literature Reviews: Insights from Qualitative Data Analysis and Tool-Support (2015, methodology): “They captured information about different variables of interest in different nodes and, for each node, they built an “evidence table” to summarize available evidence for that variable (see Table 1 in Leseure et al., 2004).”