Achieving Rigor in Literature Reviews: Insights from Qualitative Data Analysis and Tool-Support

327 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Emotions in Tourism: Theoretical Designs, Measurements, Analytics, and Interpretations (2020, methodology): “The initial corpus of papers was complemented by conducting backward (citations in key papers identified during the initial phase were reviewed for relevance) and forward searches (papers citing key papers were reviewed) using Google Scholar (Bandara et al. 2015; Caruelle et al. 2019; Snyder 2019).”
Robotic Process Automation: Contemporary themes and challenges (2020, background): “analysis followed a quasi-deductive approach [6].”
Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2020, background): “Semantic Scholar, for example, writes in its FAQ “ you may search for papers on Semantic Scholar using AND/OR query terms, ” yet it failed most query-based tests (criteria 10, 12, 15, and 19).”
The Sociotechnical Axis of Cohesion for the IS Discipline: Its Historical Legacy and its Continued Relevance (2019, methodology): “As shown in Table A1, we predefined the values that could be assigned to three out of the four attributes (1, 2, and 3), and performed the coding deductively for these three aspects (Bandara et al. 2015).”