Individual differences in impression management: an exploration of the psychological processes underlying faking

By Rose A. Mueller-Hanson, Eric D. Heggestad, G. C. Thornton. 2006

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7417ecec3927a4ceec8268774327f91ec4e7f7a4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Helga Peeters
2. Filip Lievens
3. Jill E. Ellingson
4. Lynn A. McFarland
5. T. Macan
6. Greet van Hoye
7. M. C. Campion
8. Robert E. Ployhart

Citations in the corpus

• Verbal and Nonverbal Impression Management Tactics in Behavior Description and Situational Interviews (2006, background): “And likewise, Mueller-Hanson, Heggestad, and Thornton (2003) stated that self-monitoring leads to higher intentions to fake and to higher faking bahavior.”
• Understanding Faking Behavior Through the Lens of Motivation: An Application of VIE Theory (2011, methodology): “Machiavellianism has been linked to faking behavior (Mueller-Hanson et al., 2006; Snell et al., 1999).”