Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review

281 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: A multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies (2019, unknown): “…& Ferrin, 2002; Dulebohn, Bommer, Liden, Brouer, & Ferris, 2012; Hammond, Neff, Farr, Schwall, & Zhao, 2011; Hoch, Bommer, Dulebohn, & Wu, 2018; Mackey, Frieder, Brees, & Martinko, 2017; Martin, Guillaume, Thomas, Lee, & Epitropaki, 2016; Wang, Oh, Courtright, & Colbert, 2011; Zhang & Liao, 2015).”
Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective (2017, unknown): “Similarly, Zhang and Liao (2015) also considered these three types of organizational justice as possible outcomes of abusive supervision.”
Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review (2017, background): “…engagement in hostile verbal and non-verbal behaviors, excluding physical contact ; Mackey, Frieder, Brees, & Martinko, in press; Tepper, 2000; Zhang & Liao, 2015) have all failed to address leader stress as a potential antecedent of leader behaviors or follower stress as potential…”
Examining the impact of abusive supervision on employees’ psychological wellbeing and turnover intention: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation (2020, methodology): “With abusing subordinates, managers must check out other methods to curtail their hindrance or adverse moods (Y. Y. Zhang & Liao, 2015) because there is no good and ethical explanation for abuse at the workplace (Khan et al., 2018).”