Which resources matter the most to firm success? An exploratory study of resource-based theory

By Jeremy Galbreath. 2005

635 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e14b5bb90a554237428bfb8ff472592583bb57e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Risk‐related disclosures by non‐finance companies: Portuguese practices and disclosure characteristics (2011, background): “One such valuable resource is corporate reputation – an intangible asset that is nurtured to fulfil stakeholders' expectations and attract investors and resources ( Galbreath, 2005”
Comprehensive Board Diversity and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market (2017, background): “The classical view suggests that a firm’s resources comprise of tangible and intangible assets (Wernerfelt 1984; Galbreath 2005).”
The role of intellectual resources, product innovation capability, reputational resources and marketing capability combinations in firm growth (2014, methodology): “Intellectual resources such as licences, trade marks and patents are all afforded legal protection through property rights making it difficult for competitors to duplicate them (Galbreath, 2005).”
Corporate Social Responsibility That “Pays”: A Strategic Approach to CSR for SMEs ** (2017, background): “These include both tangible and intangible resources and capabilities such as intellectual property assets, organizational assets and reputational assets (Galbreath 2005).”
Dynamic Capability Building in Service Value Networks for Achieving Service Innovation (2009, background): “Teece (2000) acknowledges, and Galbreath (2005) empirically supports, the fact that capabilities are not only tacit in nature, but they are inextricably embedded within the organizational experience, learning, and practices adopted by the firm (e.g., in relationship management and collaborative…”
The impact of corporate reputation on brand attitude and purchase intention (2016, background): “…and the moderating effect of corporate reputation, which assesses the interaction between corporate reputation and other variables, has not especially been studied, even though it has been found to affect consumers’ attitudes and companies’ success (Galbreath 2005; Schwaiger 2004; Wang et al.”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives (2006, background): “define resources rather broadly so as to include capabilities (Galbreath, 2005); other authors, clearly distinguish”