Narratives and Cancer Communication

By Melanie C. Green. 2006

647 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Speech and Hearing, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6da59865050cf0e822d405b94fd6065f62b1e83a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Speech and Hearing

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

How stories generate consumer engagement: An exploratory study (2019, background): “Storytelling content always contains a story plot and characters (Escalas, 2004; Green, 2006).”
The role of dimensions of narrative engagement in narrative persuasion (2009, background): “As Green (2006) argues, when all mental resources are occu pied with a narrative, there is no capacity left for critical analysis of story content.”
Improving the Effectiveness of Fundraising Messages: The Impact of Charity Goal Attainment, Message Framing, and Evidence on Persuasion (2008, background): “…vivid, narrative case histories are more compelling than abstract, statistical information because they evoke stronger mental imagery, reduce counterarguments, and have a stronger intuitive appeal (e.g., Green, 2006; Green & Brock, 2000; Green, Brock, & Kaufman, 2004; Reinard, 1988; Rook, 1987).”
The Extended Transportation-Imagery Model: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers' Narrative Transportation (2014, positive): “People who do not mentally imagine the plot are less likely to experience this effect (Green et al. 2008). A story plot influences narrative transportation to the extent that it provokes mental imagery (Escalas 2004a; Green and Brock 2000). For example, Van den Hende et al. (2007) find that stories ”
Narrative, transportation and advertising (2015, background): “Therefore, the effort required to initiate and maintain such processes is likely to vary across individuals, illuminating a research vein deserving of further attention (Green 2006).”
Why Narrative Ads Work: An Integrated Process Explanation (2017, background): “Of the four explanatory variables in our framework, emotive response is closely related to the construct of empathetic processing proposed by Deighton, Romer, and McQueen (1989), Green and Brock (2000), and others.”
Transportation and Need for Affect in Narrative Persuasion: A Mediated Moderation Model (2010, background): “In previous studies, the impact of situational factors has often been weak and inconsistent, for example, with regard to the impact of fact/fiction labels ( Green & Brock, 2000 ; Green, Garst, Brock, & Chung, 2006 ; Prentice et al, 1997 ; Strange & Leung, 1999 ) or specific reading goal instructi”
Involved, Transported, or Emotional? Exploring the Determinants of Change in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior in Entertainment Education (2011, background): “Because of its ability to involve viewers in the lives, loves, and losses of familiar fictional characters, television may be particularly well-suited to convey healthrelated information (Green, 2006).”
Predictors and Consequences of Conversations About Health Promoting Media Messages (2010, background): “In the current study, we explore this possibility, as well as the possibility that narrative messages, frequently posited as being more psychologically engaging than expository messages (Green, 2006), are more likely to generate a sharing of opinions.”
Exploring How Video Digital Storytelling Builds Relationship Experiences (2016, background): “Imagery of a story plot is vital to narrative transportation such that, through a mentally imagined plot, stories resemble real-life experiences (Green, 2006).”
Identification as a Mechanism of Narrative Persuasion (2012, background): “This phenomenon has been termed “narrative persuasion” and has attracted research interest from various disciplines such as health communication (Green, 2006), entertainment-education (Morgan, Movius, & Cody, 2009; Moyer-Gusé & Nabi, 2010),”
The Role of Theory in Developing Effective Health Communications (2006, background): “Some of the articles in this special issue directly address this question (see Green, 2006; Rimer & Kreuter, 2006).”
Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences (2014, background): “As long as such persuasive intent remains concealed, acceptance of narrative evaluations is thought to represent the default outcome of exposure, where rejection is only possible with added scrutiny afterward (4, 57).”