Sensitivity to Violations of Gender Agreement in Native and Nonnative Spanish: An Eye‐Movement Investigation
By Gregory D. Keating. 2009
225 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d1a09d8ccfab6e76ba91618f744eae59078b0ff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Ian Cunnings
- Holger Hopp
- Annie Tremblay
- Caitlin E. Coughlin
- Claudia Felser
- Harald Clahsen
- Kathleen Neubauer
- Robert Fiorentino
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Ian Cunnings
- Holger Hopp
- Caitlin E. Coughlin
- Annie Tremblay
- Claudia Felser
- Harald Clahsen
- S. Montrul
- S. Loewen
Citations in the corpus
- TIMED AND UNTIMED GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENTS MEASURE DISTINCT TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE (2015, background): “5 In a study on gender agreement, Keating ( 2009 ) found that native Spanish speakers and advanced L2 learners looked longer at (in total) and regressed more from incongruous adjectives than congruous ones.”
- Morphological Structure in Native and Nonnative Language Processing (2010, methodology): “…during L2 processing comes from a number of studies using ERPs (e.g., Chen et al., 2007; Sabourin & Haverkort, 2003), self-paced reading (Jiang, 2004, 2007), eyemovement monitoring (Keating, 2009; Lew-Williams & Fernald, 2007), or timed grammaticality judgments (McDonald, 2000; Sato, 2007 ).”
- Early language experience facilitates the processing of gender agreement in Spanish heritage speakers* (2013, methodology): “…able to process gender agreement as automatically and efficiently as native speakers in real time, and whether they show the same type of sensitivity to gender cues as native speakers (Alarcón, 2009; Grüter et al., 2012; Keating, 2009; Lew-Williams & Fernald, 2010; Sagarra & Herschensohn, 2011).”
- Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing (2012, methodology): “The results of Jiang (2004) and Keating (2009) suggest that linear distance between two elements in an agreement dependency can potentially increase the difficulty with which L2 learners process such dependencies.”
- Spanish gender agreement under complete and incomplete acquisition: Early and late bilinguals' linguistic behavior within the noun phrase* (2011, background): “Current psycholinguistic research on L2 Spanish gender indicates that learners are sensitive to a variety of linguistic variables when assessing gender agreement correctness in online comprehension tasks (e.g., Alarcón, 2006, 2009; Keating, 2009; Sagarra, 2007; Tokowicz & MacWhinney, 2005).”
- Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking ☆ (2012, background): “ers showed an N400 effect which has been associated with L2 learning in recent studies (Inoue & Osterhout, 2005; McLaughlin et al., 2010; Osterhout et al., 2004). This effect will be further discussed below. Our results are line with Tokowicz and MacWhinney’s (2005) proposal that structures are more”
- Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability (2013, result): “…the present findings resonate with research investigating sensitivity to gender agreement within the violation paradigm tracking reading times (Keating, 2009; Sagarra and Herschensohn, 2010) or ERP signatures in natural (Gabriele et al., 2012; Gillon Dowens et al., 2010) and artificial…”
- Morphosyntactic processing in advanced second language (L2) learners: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of L1–L2 similarity and structural distance (2014, result): “Crucially, the results of these two ERP studies are mostly consistent with previous L2 studies which have examined the effects of distance on L2 acquisition and processing (Foote, 2011; Keating, 2009, 2010; Myles, 1995).”
- Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing (2016, background): “Keating (2010) included sentences of both types in his study (although this factor was not systematically varied). A combination of FACILITATORY and INHIBITORY retrieval interference could explain the L2ers’ reduced sensitivity to gender violations in sentences likes (13b,c). In (13b), FACILITATORY ”