Morphological Structure in Native and Nonnative Language Processing
By Harald Clahsen, Claudia Felser, Kathleen Neubauer, Mikako Sato, Renita Silva. 2010
229 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a330a84f04ca55c69782e38f7b1a712dc758227c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
- Emmanuel Keuleers
- Robert Fiorentino
- José Alemán Bañón
- Alison Gabriele
- Joanna Morris
- Kevin Diependaele
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
- Emmanuel Keuleers
- Robert Fiorentino
- José Alemán Bañón
- Alison Gabriele
- Joanna Morris
- Kevin Diependaele
Citations in the corpus
- Morphosyntactic processing in advanced second language (L2) learners: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of L1–L2 similarity and structural distance (2014, methodology): “No differences between number and gender are predicted, since the Shallow Structure Hypothesis assumes that L1 transfer does not play a deterministic role in L2 syntactic processing (e.g. Clahsen and Felser, 2006; Clahsen et al., 2010; Marinis et al., 2005).”
- Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition (2011, background): “Our data confirm the hypothesis that bilinguals largely adopt the same processing strategies as native speakers (e.g., Lemhöfer et al., 2008), and constrain the hypothesis that bilinguals rely more heavily on whole-word processing in their second language (Ullman, 2004, 2005; Clahsen et al., 2010).”