Classroom Discussion: A Method of Instruction and a Curriculum Outcome.
By Bruce E. Larson. 2000
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b08b7bed95fed0211b122b14fe6b76b7715b54c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- P. Uccelli
- Maria D. LaRusso
- Ha Yeon Kim
- James S. Kim
- Suzanne Donovan
- Stephanie M. Jones
- Catherine E. Snow
- W. Parker
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Teaching with and for Discussion. (2001, background): “W.C. Parker, D. Hess / Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (2001) 273}289 285 10 Larson (2000) explores this distinction in the pedagogical thinking of high school teachers.”
- Discussing Controversial Public Issues in Secondary Social Studies Classrooms: Learning from Skilled Teachers (2002, background): “Moreover, teachers use discussion to accomplish varied goals, which can be separated broadly into process and product (or outcome) categories (Larson, 2000).”
- Experimental Effects of Word Generation on Vocabulary, Academic Language, Perspective Taking, and Reading Comprehension in High-Poverty Schools (2019, background): “…(a widely recommended but rarely implemented practice; Applebee, Langer, Nystrand, & Gamoran, 2003; Elizabeth, Ross Anderson, Snow, & Selman, 2012; Larson, 2000) and growth in vocabulary contribute to the development of academic language and perspective-taking skills, which in turn predict…”