Research on Direct versus Translated Writing: Students' Strategies and Their Results

By Andrew Dight Cohen, Amanda Brooks-Carson. 2001

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a26fe992c1e9505124512fff7c188f6e7ed5642

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Sadiq Abdulwahed Ahmed Ismail
2. Shu-Chiao Tsai
3. A. U. Chamot

In Language and Linguistics

1. Sadiq Abdulwahed Ahmed Ismail
2. Shu-Chiao Tsai
3. A. U. Chamot
4. Aek Phakiti
5. Lian Zhang
6. Lawrence Jun Zhang
7. E. Macaro
8. Aijiao Wu

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Sadiq Abdulwahed Ahmed Ismail
2. Shu-Chiao Tsai
3. A. U. Chamot
4. Aek Phakiti
5. Lian Zhang
6. Lawrence Jun Zhang
7. Aijiao Wu
8. E. Macaro

Citations in the corpus

• Chinese students’ perceptions of using Google Translate as a translingual CALL tool in EFL writing (2020, methodology): “(Cohen & BrooksCarson, 2001; Tavakoli et al., 2014).”
• Exploring Students’ Perceptions of ESL Writing (2011, background): “The issue whether second language student writers attempt to think directly through the second language (L2) or through translating from the first language (L1) while composing a text generated some interesting research (Weijen et al., 2009; Wang and Wen 2002; Cohen and Brooks-Carson, 2001).”
• LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY INSTRUCTION: CURRENT ISSUES AND RESEARCH (2005, background): “A study of writing strategies instruction was recently conducted in England with six classes of secondary students of French (Macaro, 2001).”