Interpersonal Justice and Deviance

By Brian C. Holtz, C. Harold. 2013

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69b08d285ac36737aa46f114de1c06ba0c267953

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Daniel D. Goering
2. Ernest H. O’Boyle
3. Jack E. Carson
4. S. Seibert
5. Charn P. McAllister
6. J. Mackey
7. B. P. Ellen
8. Sheryl L. Walter

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Ernest H. O’Boyle
2. Jack E. Carson
3. S. Seibert
4. Charn P. McAllister
5. J. Mackey
6. B. P. Ellen

Citations in the corpus

• A Meta-Analysis of Interpersonal and Organizational Workplace Deviance Research (2019, background): “Social psychological insights tend to focus on how justice perceptions (e.g., Holtz & Harold, 2013) and social exchange perceptions (e.g., Mitchell & Ambrose, 2007) explain why employees engage in workplace deviance.”
• A Tale of Two Sample Sources: Do Results from Online Panel Data and Conventional Data Converge? (2018, background): “…MTurk 201 NA 0.92 TOI 0.92 0.27 Gangadharan 2014 N MTurk 201 PA 0.93 TOI 0.92 − 0.19 Giacopelli, Simpson, Dalal, Randolph, & Holland 2013 Y MTurk 237 CON 0.92 JS 0.94 0.51 Giacopelli et al. 2013 Y MTurk 237 CON 0.92 TOI 0.92 − 0.36 Goo 2015 N StudyResponse 381 L 0.92 JS 0.96 0.42 Hannah, Jennings,…”