Examining contemporary careers: A call for interdisciplinary inquiry

By M. Arthur. 2008

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Gender Studies, Human Factors and Ergonomics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/690c6e394287c286728bbbd00b5faa5417069257

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Gender Studies

In Human Factors and Ergonomics

Citations in the corpus

The development and validation of a measure for protean career orientation (2014, methodology): “Theoretically, the area of ‘new career’ (Lips-Wiersma and Hall 2007; Arthur 2008) is still in its early stages in terms of quantitative empirical studies (Inkson et al. 2012), but novel concepts should be tested using acceptable measures.”
Toward a taxonomy of career studies through bibliometric visualization (2014, methodology): “Critics have pointed out that the career field includes various disjointed research streams,which do not systematically connect to each other even when they concern the same phenomena (Arnold & Cohen, 2008; Arthur, 2008).”
Identity Workspaces: The Case of Business Schools (2010, background): “Such study would exploit an ideal setting for examining the identity work of those individuals that are most likely to use business schools as identity workspaces, that is, managers engaged in individually driven and boundarycrossing careers (Arthur, 2008).”
Advances in Career Theory and Research: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Exploration (2009, background): “In response to the “boundaryless organization” theme of the 1993 Academy of Management conference, the term boundaryless career was coined to offer a new perspective on contemporary Sullivan and Baruch 1551 careers (Arthur, 2008).”
Career attitudes and success of managers: the impact of chance event, protean, and traditional careers (2012, methodology): “We built our conceptual framework on current career theory (Arthur 2008; Sullivan and Baruch 2009; Sturges, Conway and Liefooghe 2010), combined with Hobfoll’s (1989, 1998) COR theory, which reflects reactions of people to stressful situations and theway they handle these events.”