Increasing Social Interaction among Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities and Their General Education Peers: Effective Interventions
166 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65e229a25e84e6d6708a15df99054287590586a1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- E. Carter
- Lynn G. Sisco
- Mary E. Morningstar
- Yun-Ching Chung
- Tina L. Stanton-Chapman
- C. Hughes
- J. Kurth
- C. Kennedy
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Lynn G. Sisco
- E. Carter
- Yun-Ching Chung
- Tina L. Stanton-Chapman
- Mary E. Morningstar
- J. Kurth
- C. Hughes
- C. Kennedy
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- E. Carter
- Lynn G. Sisco
- Yun-Ching Chung
- Tina L. Stanton-Chapman
- J. Kurth
- C. Kennedy
- Mary E. Morningstar
- C. Hughes
Citations in the corpus
- Promoting Access to the General Curriculum Using Peer Support Strategies (2006, background): “The social benefits of peer-mediated strategies are welldocumented (e.g., Carter & Hughes, 2005; McConnell, 2002).”
- Effects of a Social Skills Intervention among High School Students with Intellectual Disabilities and Autism and Their General Education Peers (2011, background): “Incorporating general education peers into social skills instructional programs has been effective at increasing social interaction of high school students with intellectual disabilities and autism and their classmates (cf. Carter & Hughes, 2005).”
- Including High School Students with Severe Disabilities in General Education Classes: Perspectives of General and Special Educators, Paraprofessionals, and Administrators (2006, background): “Furthermore, research documenting the social, academic, and behavioral benefits associated with inclusion in general education classes is accumulating steadily (e.g., Carter & Hughes, 2005; Fisher & Meyer, 2002; Freeman & Alkin, 2000; Ryndak & Fisher, 2003).”
- Examining National Trends in Educational Placements for Students With Significant Disabilities (2017, background): “…of the positive influence of general education on academic achievement (Cosier, Causton-Theoharis, & Theoharis, 2013), adaptive behavior (Dessemontet & Bless, 2013), self-determination (Hughes, Agran, Cosgriff, & Washington, 2013), and social problem solving and engagement (Carter & Hughes, 2005).”
- The Persistence of Highly Restrictive Special Education Placements for Students With Low-Incidence Disabilities (2014, background): “…has further demonstrated that students with low-incidence disabilities learn communication (Foreman, Arthur-Kelly, Pascoe, & King, 2004), social (Carter & Hughes, 2005; Fisher & Meyer, 2002), and employment skills when fully involved in general education settings (Benz, Lindstrom, & Yovanoff,…”
- Peer Supports as an Alternative to Individually Assigned Paraprofessionals in Inclusive High School Classrooms (2007, background): “Given the limited generalized intervention effects noted in previous social interaction literature reviews (Carter & Hughes, 2005), more deliberate attention should be given to refining peer support intervention components to promote broader social outcomes within these classrooms.”
- Peer Interactions of Students with Intellectual Disabilities and/or Autism: A Map of the Intervention Literature (2010, methodology): “Second, we examined bibliographies of related research reviews (e.g., Bellini et al., 2007; Carter & Hughes, 2005; National Autism Center, 2009; National Research Council, 2001; McConnell, 2002; Reichow & Volkmar, 2010) and each identified article (i.e., ancestral search).”