The Effects of Reduced Food Size and Package Size on the Consumption Behavior of Restrained and Unrestrained Eaters
By Maura L. Scott, S. Nowlis, N. Mandel, Andrea C. Morales. 2008
267 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64ba9170c91f2509ee73bd28a4531ed68d866f7a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Chris Dubelaar
- S. Holden
- Natalina Zlatevska
- Blair Kidwell
- Maura L. Scott
- N. Mandel
- Thomas Mussweiler
- Darren W. Dahl
In Marketing
- K. White
- Darren W. Dahl
- Eric T. Bradlow
- Jennifer J. Argo
- Robin J. B. Ritchie
- Chris Dubelaar
- S. Holden
- Natalina Zlatevska
Citations in the corpus
- When Do Consumers Avoid Imperfections? Superficial Packaging Damage as a Contamination Cue (2016, background): “Consumers are known to rely on the package to make inferences about key aspects of the underlying product, including quality (McDaniel and Baker 1977), innovativeness (Nijssen 1999), desirability (Underwood and Klein 2002), and healthfulness (Scott et al. 2008).”
- The Effects of Thin and Heavy Media Images on Overweight and Underweight Consumers: Social Comparison Processes and Behavioral Implications (2010, background): “A number of consumer researchers have recently shifted their focus to identifying the causes of maladaptive consumer behaviors, such as overeating and obesity (e.g., Chandon and Wansink 2007; Scott et al. 2008) and prescribing ways to alleviate such behaviors (Mick 2008).”
- Sizing up the Effect of Portion Size on Consumption: A Meta-Analytic Review (2014, background): “For example, in a study by Scott et al. (2008), the “small food configuration” comprised multiple small packages of many mini M&M’s and the “large” configuration comprised a few large packages of fewer, regular-size M&M’s.”
- Promoting positive change: Advancing the food well-being paradigm☆ (2013, background): “Portion controlled packaging (i.e., 100-calorie packs) may license dieting consumers to eat more while the opposite is found for non-dieting consumers (Scott et al., 2008).”
- How Credit Card Payments Increase Unhealthy Food Purchases: Visceral Regulation of Vices (2011, background): “…elicited by emotive imagery and associated sensations, and that such decisions could be inconsistent with one’s long-term plans and goals (Baumeister 2002; Hoch and Lowenstein 1991; Kivetz and Keinen 2006; Loewenstein 1996; Metcalfe and Mischel 1999; Rook 1987; Scott et al. 2008; Wertenbroch 1998).”
- Reflections on the replication corner: In praise of conceptual replications (2015, methodology): “Created new fictitious brand names and added consideration of the effect of consonants in brand names Lenoir et al. (2013) The impact of cultural symbols and spokesperson identity on attitudes and intentions Deshpandé and Stayman (1994), J. Marketing Research; Forehand and Deshpandé (2001), J. Marke”
- I’ll Have What She’s Having: Effects of Social Influence and Body Type on the Food Choices of Others (2010, unknown): “Perceived Healthiness of Food Choices While there have been several studies examining eating behavior, such studies have tended to focus on unhealthy items, such as cookies (Roth et al. 2001), ice cream (Johnston 2002), and candy (Scott et al. 2008).”
- How Images of Other Consumers Influence Subsequent Taste Perceptions (2013, background): “Yet, although an increasing body of research has examined the various ways external food cues can influence consumers’ perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors (e.g., Chernev 2011; Mishra and Mishra 2011; Raghunathan, Naylor, and Hoyer 2006; Scott et al. 2008; Shiv and Fedorikhin 1999; Wansink and Chan”
- When Healthy Food Makes You Hungry (2010, background): “Eating healthy poses a constraint on people’s food choice: rather than selecting what seems most appropriate to satisfy their appetite, they need to select from a subset of foods that are also healthy or skip an opportunity to eat (e.g., choose small packages to limit their food consumption; Scott e”