New directions in differential equations: A framework for interpreting students' understandings and difficulties

By Chris Rasmussen. 2001

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e68fb176249e04d0afe4b4c21e399c0697c75ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

The Precalculus Concept Assessment: A Tool for Assessing Students’ Reasoning Abilities and Understandings (2010, unknown): “, 2002; Thompson, 1994c) and for understanding major concepts in beginning calculus (Carlson et al., 2003; Cottrill, Dubinsky, Nichols, Schwingendorf, Thomas, & Vidakovic, 1996; Kaput, 1992; Rasmussen, 2000; Thompson, 1994b; Zandieh, 2000).”
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (2011, background): “Thus, children were taught to move based on elite, adult movement models rather than developmentally appropriate patterns such as those that Roberton (1982) described.”
Examining individual and collective level mathematical progress (2014, methodology): “Rasmussen (2001) made use of the interpretive framework to analyze the role of the classroom participation structure in individual student learning.”
Quantitative Reasoning and the Sine Function: The Case of Zac. (2014, background): “A growing body of literature (e.g., CastilloGarsow, 2010, 2012; Confrey & Smith, 1995; Ellis, 2007; Moore, 2012; Oehrtman, Carlson, & Thompson, 2008; Rasmussen, 2001; P. W. Thompson, 1994b, 2011) has identified such reasoning to be critical in supporting student learning in secondary and undergradua”
Applying Covariational Reasoning While Modeling Dynamic Events: A Framework and a Study. (2002, background): “Research has also shown that this ability is essential for interpreting models of dynamic events (Kaput, 1994; Rasmussen, 2000) and is foundational for understanding major concepts of calculus (Cottrill, Dubinsky, Nichols, Schwingendorf, Thomas, & Vidakovic, 1996; Kaput, 1994; Thompson, 1994a; Zandi”