Lifespan Developmental Perspectives on Working: A Literature Review of Motivational Theories

By C. Rudolph. 2016

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d7408f55d21afe6dcdfc06bae5d0c5429e04476

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. H. Zacher
2. C. Rudolph
3. D. Kooij
4. Mo Wang
5. R. Rauvola
6. Ulrike Fasbender
7. A. Wöhrmann
8. Ute‐Christine Klehe

In Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

1. D. Kooij
2. R. Rauvola
3. C. Rudolph
4. Mo Wang
5. H. Zacher
6. A. Wöhrmann
7. Ute‐Christine Klehe
8. Ulrike Fasbender

In Sociology and Political Science

1. H. Zacher
2. A. Hirschi
3. C. Rudolph
4. D. Kooij
5. Mo Wang
6. R. Rauvola
7. Kristen M Shockley
8. Florian Kunze

Citations in the corpus

• Occupational Future Time Perspective: A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Outcomes (2018, background): “This analysis also responds to a recent call by Rudolph (2016) to conduct integrative tests of the various developmental regulation mechanisms proposed by different lifespan developmental theories.”
• Leadership and generations at work: A critical review (2017, background): “The good news is that the major propositions of the lifespan perspective and its associated theories have received much empirical support over the past three decades, both within and outside of the work context (Baltes, Lindenberger, & Staudinger, 2006; Rudolph, 2016).”
• Is the future still open? The mediating role of occupational future time perspective in the effects of career adaptability and aging experience on late career planning (2019, background): “Research on older workers, whose most imminent transition may be the question on whether and when to retire or how to handle the time subsequent to their official retirement age, is scarce, however (Rudolph, 2016; Rudolph et al., 2017).”
• Successful aging at work: A process model to guide future research and practice (2020, background): “The lifespan psychology literature provides a broad conceptual framework for understanding individual aspects of aging at work (Rudolph, 2016; Zacher et al., 2016), but needs to be complemented with insights from organizational psychology and its more specific focus on the complexities of the job…”
• Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology (2020, background): “the impact of COVID-19 on the aging workforce, researchers would be wise to adopt a lifespan developmental perspective (see Baltes, Reese, & Lipsitt, 1980; Rudolph, 2016).”