Influences of Stimulating Tasks on Reading Motivation and Comprehension

By J. Guthrie, Allan Wigfield, Nicole M. Humenick, Kathleen C. Perencevich, A. Taboada, Pedro Barbosa. 2006

379 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d1daf4bac68600d828a7219542f3dad24e89049

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Assessment and learning: fields apart? (2017, background): “…2009, p. 23) The framework in 2009 reflected a stronger research influence by scholars such as Guthrie (2008), Guthrie and Wigfield (2000), and Guthrie et al. (2006) on engagement and motivation to read, as well as the work on reading comprehension by Pressley et al. (Pressley, 2006,…”
Gender differences in the strength of association between motivation, competency beliefs and reading skill (2011, background): “Guthrie et al. (2006) have found that it is possible to increase reading comprehension levels by combining a high number of stimulating tasks, which are associated with the reading material.”
Students' achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes (2010, neutral): “, 2002 ; Guthrie et al .”
Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension (2008, background): “Studies have shown that both motivational (Chapman & Tunmer, 1995; Guthrie, Wigfield, Metsala, & Cox, 1999; Guthrie et al., 2006) and cognitive variables (e.”
The impact of non-cognitive skills on outcomes for young people. A literature review. (2013, background): “In a quasi-experimental study, Guthrie and colleagues examined the role of using interesting, hands-on tasks in the classroom to stimulate intrinsic motivation for reading (Guthrie et al., 2006).”
Profiles of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations in Elementary School: A Longitudinal Analysis (2014, background): “…the robust association between intrinsic motivation and academic achievement in Corpus et al. and the broader variable-centered literature (e.g., Guthrie et al., 2006; Lepper et al., 2005; Ryan & Deci, 2000; Sansone & Harackiewicz, 2000), not every profile with substantial intrinsic motivation…”
Motivation Interventions in Education (2016, background): “…e.g., Muis et al., 2013), transformative experiences (4 studies; e.g., Pugh, 2002), possible selves (3 studies; e.g., Oyserman et al., 2006), interest theory (2 studies; e.g., Guthrie et al., 2006), and several theories with one study (goal setting, need for achievement, and self-confrontation).”
Essential Elements of Fostering and Teaching Reading Comprehension (2011, background): “…reading for authentic purposes, and texts with a clear structure and vivid, concrete examples is associated with motivated engagement and, subsequently, better recall and learning (Guthrie et al., 2006; Purcell-Gates, Duke, & Martineau, 2007; Sadoski, Goetz, & Rodriguez, 2000; Schraw et al., 2001).”