Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation
By Linda D. Hollebeek, Mark Glynn, Roderick Brodie. 2014
3,058 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ce55033ef29f67ba5a9bf746f96962364c33e4d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Ali Abdallah Alalwan
- Raquel Sánchez-Fernández
- David Jiménez-Castillo
- Linda D. Hollebeek
- Nripendra P. Rana
- Nannan Xi
- Abdullah Mohammed Baabdullah
- Zillur Rahman
In Marketing
- Linda D. Hollebeek
- Zillur Rahman
- Jamid Ul Islam
- Heikki Karjaluoto
- Urška Tuškej
- K. Podnar
- Matti Leppäniemi
- Janne Hepola
In Sociology and Political Science
- Linda D. Hollebeek
- Zillur Rahman
- Ali Abdallah Alalwan
- Jamid Ul Islam
- Nannan Xi
- J. Bowden
- Raquel Sánchez-Fernández
- David Jiménez-Castillo
Citations in the corpus
- Using Message Strategy to Drive Consumer Behavioral Engagement on Social Media (2018, positive): “Consumer engagement is a multidimensional concept manifested in various forms of emotional, cognitive and behavioral responses with a brand or firm focus (Hollebeek et al., 2014).”
- Certainty in Language Increases Consumer Engagement on Social Media (2021, background): “For instance, engaging consumers on social media is known to positively affect brand attitude (Cruz et al., 2017; Hollebeek et al., 2014), and future research could assess whether engagement resulting from the expression of certainty in messaging affects downstream marketing outcomes such as sales a”
- Measuring Consumers' Engagement With Brand-Related Social-Media Content (2016, background): “A 2014 study addressed the need for an instrument to capture consumers’ engagement with brands on social media by developing a scale to measure such engagement in a brand community (Hollebeek, Glynn, and Brodie, 2014).”
- Expanding customer engagement: the role of negative engagement, dual valences and contexts (2020, methodology): “Namely, Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn operate as voluntary “opt-in” services that allow customers to forge social and professional connections, create and share content, self-brand and discuss shared interests with others (Miller, 2017; Hollebeek et al., 2014).”
- Exploring online customer engagement with hospitality products and its relationship with involvement, emotional states, experience and brand advocacy (2019, methodology): “Although past research has regarded cognitive processing as one of the important dimensions of engagement (e.g., Brodie et al., 2013; Hollebeek et al., 2014), as far as we know, the current study is the first to show empirically that cognitive processing is more relevant than affection and…”
- Examining online social brand engagement: a social presence theory perspective (2017, methodology): “Item Factor Loading CR AVE Brand Usage Intent (Hollebeek et al., 2014) 0.885 0.660 It makes sense to use brand X following my engagement with the brand 0.704 Even if another brand has the same features as brand X, I would prefer to use brand X 0.872 If there is another brand as good as brand X, I pr”
- Understanding consumers’ social media engagement behaviour: An examination of the moderation effect of social media context (2021, positive): “The richness of social networking sites becomes increasingly important in the fashion context as it can foster social and interactive experiences beyond core purchase behaviour (Malthouse & Hofacker, 2010; Hollebeek, Glynn, & Brodie, 2014).”