Female board appointments and firm valuation: short and long-term effects

By Kevin Campbell, Antonio Mínguez Vera. 2010

300 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c803abc560224bbbb5cfdbb177a4555a8eacd3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Gender Studies

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Women on the boards of listed companies: Evidence from Finland (2010, background): “…of Jyväskylä, 35 (MaE 202), Jyväskylä 40014, Finland e-mail: aila.k.virtanen@jyu.fi 2004), Canada (Burke 1997), Australia (Kang et al. 2007; Sheridan 2001), Spain (Campbell and Vera 2010), and Norway (Huse et al. 2009), and also from many less developed countries (Terjesen and Singh 2008).”
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?” (2012, unknown): “While some of the differences may be due to the data stemming from different countries (with differing board systems) and different time periods (Campbell and Mı́nguez-Vera 2010) or from the use of different performance measures and estimation methods (Campbell and Mı́nguezVera 2008, p.”
Female leadership, performance, and governance in microfinance institutions. (2014, unknown): “gender literature, the Kanter (1977) ‘‘window-dressing’’ or ‘‘tokenism’’ is an argument for the endogeneity of female leadership.”
Does Gender Matter in the Boardroom? Evidence from the Market Reaction to Mandatory New Director Announcements (2011, unknown): “In contrast, Campbell and Minguez-Vera (2010) examine the market reaction to 47 female director appointments to listed Spanish firms between 1989 and 2001 and find a positive and significant reaction for 2- and 3-day CARs.”
Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity (2016, background): “…skills (Eagly and Johnson 1990), and generally hold their organizations to higher ethical 2 Erhardt et al. (2003), Carter et al. (2003), Campbell and Mı́nguez-Vera (2008, 2010), Carter et al. (2010), Kang et al. (2010), Gul et al. (2011) and Mahadeo et al. (2012) Lükerath-Rovers…”
Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this) (2012, background): “, Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager–think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17,”
Women on corporate boards: key influencers or tokens? (2010, background): “Research indicates a positive relationship between firm value and females board appointments (Campbell and Vera 2008a, b; Carter et al. 2003; Francoeur et al. 2008).”