Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”
By J. Joecks, Kerstin Pull, Karin Vetter. Journal of Business Ethics, 2012
941 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1eca94317b8f3e505f925188026272069babbd6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Gender Studies
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project (2015, positive): “Following Joecks et al. (2013), we also explored whether the relation between board gender diversity and voluntary climate change disclosure is U shaped.”
- Board diversity and financial fragility: Evidence from European banks (2017, positive): “Drawing on the critical mass theory of Kanter (1977), Joecks et al (2013) argue that the influence of female directors is not the main determinant of board composition unless a critical mass of female directors has been appointed.”
- Product Innovation and Educational Diversity in Top and Middle Management Teams (2020, neutral): “Works building on the upper echelons theory have explicitly associated the effects of diversity with TMTs (Eesley et al. 2014, Campbell and Minguez-Vera 2007, Joecks et al. 2013, Miller and del Carmen Triana 2009).”
- Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System (2018, positive): “Additionally, Joecks et al. [23] show that only a critical mass of about 30%, which corresponds to three women on the board, is associated with higher financial performance.”
- Does Board Gender Diversity Influence Financial Performance? Evidence from Spain (2015, neutral): “Nevertheless, according to the arguments of Joecks et al. (2013), these studies that suggest a negative or no influence of the number of women on company performance may be affected by an overall low or high female representation which invalidates their results.”