Popularity in Early Adolescence: Prosocial and Antisocial Subtypes
By E. H. de Bruyn, Antonius H. N. Cillessen. 2006
203 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b6872a9c9e8c61bcfed316f79e5bb9737e5355b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Philip C. Rodkin
- Antonius H. N. Cillessen
- Hai-Jeong Ahn
- T. Farmer
- M. Zimmer‐Gembeck
- E. H. de Bruyn
- Rhiarne E. Pronk
- C. Garandeau
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Antonius H. N. Cillessen
- Philip C. Rodkin
- T. Farmer
- Hai-Jeong Ahn
- E. H. de Bruyn
- M. Zimmer‐Gembeck
- Rhiarne E. Pronk
- E. Andreou
In Social Psychology
- Philip C. Rodkin
- Antonius H. N. Cillessen
- T. Farmer
- Hai-Jeong Ahn
- Rhiarne E. Pronk
- M. Zimmer‐Gembeck
- Scott D. Gest
- E. H. de Bruyn
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of Classroom Embeddedness and Density on the Social Status of Aggressive and Victimized Children (2010, background): “Perceived popularity, which is also called consensual popularity (de Bruyn & Cillessen, 2006), captures students’ assessments of their peers’ social rank or reputation, regardless of how they personally feel about them.”
- The Effects of Participation Rate on the Internal Reliability of Peer Nomination Measures (2013, background): “Adolescents in the US, for example, are likely to know peers from throughout the grade (e.g., Cillessen & Mayeux, 2004) but this is not necessarily the case in US elementary schools or in secondary schools in countries outside North America (e.g., de Bruyn & Cillessen, 2006).”
- Social Context Influences on Children's Rejection by Their Peers (2010, unknown): “Youth highest in social dominance, for example, often have controversial sociometric status (de Bruyn & Cillessen, 2006); that is, they are liked by many peers and disliked by many others.”
- It’s “Mean,” But What Does It Mean to Adolescents? Relational Aggression Described by Victims, Aggressors, and Their Peers (2010, background): “Previous qualitative studies, which focused on peer-group dynamics and relational aggression in combination, have either included only girls and/or older adolescent samples (Card, 2007; de Bruyn & Cillessen, 2006; Eder, 1985; Goodwin, 2002; Owens, Slee, et al., 2000).”
- Peer Relations of Bullies, Bully-Victims, and Victims: The Two Social Worlds of Bullying in Second-Grade Classrooms (2010, background): “…of aggressive youth who are distinguished by levels of popularity and other indices of peer relations (e.g., Bierman, Smoot, & Aumiller, 1993; de Bruyn & Cillessen, 2006; Farmer et al., 2003), the present work builds upon prior research to extend existing conceptualizations about possible…”
- Developmental Changes in the Priority of Perceived Status in Childhood and Adolescence. (2010, unknown): “…cling to their reputation but maintain their status reputation in a more natural way based on the merits of their empathic abilities, social skills, or natural leadership (de Bruyn & Cillessen, 2006; Cillessen & Mayeux, 2004; Lease, Musgrove, & Axelrod, 2002; Prinstein & Cillessen, 2003).”
- Associations of Peer Acceptance and Perceived Popularity With Bullying and Victimization in Early Adolescence (2010, background): “De Bruyn and Cillessen (2006a; 2006b) found a subgroup of highly popular girls who displayed high levels of bullying.”
- Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. (2013, background): “Also missing from previous studies is consideration of behavioral heterogeneity among popular youths, such as those who are aggressive and those who are prosocial (de Bruyn & Cillessen, 2006; Rodkin et al., 2000).”