Using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) in an Outcomes-Driven Model: Steps to Reading Outcomes.

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Concurrent Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills and the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (2003, methodology): “Predictive validity of spring, kindergarten PSF with spring, first grade Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery is .68 and with curriculum-based measurement Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) is .62 (Good et al., 2001).”
Validity of the Dynamic Indicators for Basic Early Literacy Skills as an Indicator of Early Literacy for Urban Kindergarten Children (2006, background): “DIBELS authors have provided some validity evidence, but a similar limitation exists; validity was established in kindergarten using general intelligence measures, reading and math achievement, and overall reading fluency (Good et al., 2001; Kaminski & Good, 1996).”
Effects of Viewing the Television Program Between the Lions on the Emergent Literacy Skills of Young Children (2004, methodology): “The Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) assessment tool (Good & Kaminski, 2000; Kaminski & Good, 1996), comprising three individually administered and timed subtests (letter naming [LN], phonemic segmentation fluency [PSF], and nonsense word fluency [NWF]), was administered to”