The influence of interdependent self-construal on procedural fairness effects

By J. Brockner, David de Cremer, K. van den Bos, Ya-Ru Chen. 2005

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a589314c0b83350eef319c722258f28031d8e7f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. H. Kwan
2. Osman M. Karatepe
3. Zhi Qiang Liu
4. Qian Qiu
5. Hean Tat Keh
6. J. Alba
7. Lisa E. Bolton
8. Zhaoquan Jian

In Social Psychology

1. H. Kwan
2. Zhi Qiang Liu
3. Qian Qiu
4. Hean Tat Keh
5. Osman M. Karatepe
6. J. Alba
7. Lisa E. Bolton
8. Zhaoquan Jian

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Zhi Qiang Liu
2. Qian Qiu
3. Hean Tat Keh
4. H. Kwan
5. Osman M. Karatepe
6. J. Alba
7. Lisa E. Bolton
8. Zhaoquan Jian

Citations in the corpus

• Procedural Justice, Work Engagement, and Job Outcomes: Evidence from Nigeria (2011, background): “From an instrumental perspective, fair procedures are critical, since they result in more tangible outcomes ( Brockner, de Cremer, van den Bos, & Chen, 2005 ).”
• Abusive supervision and frontline employees' service performance (2012, background): “Past research has also found that high-RISC people react more negatively to procedural injustice (Brockner et al., 2005).”
• How Do Price Fairness Perceptions Differ across Culture? (2010, background): “Moreover, fair pricing may be viewed as a form of distributive justice, and it seems reasonable to expect that culture will also influence demands for, and the impact of, interactional and procedural justice (e.g., Brockner et al. 2005)— topics that merit further research.”