Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Review of Research and a Meta-Analysis of the Seductive Detail Effect. (2012, background): “Other studies did not measure prior knowledge via self-assessment or an objective test (e.g., Bartsch & Cobern, 2003; Garner et al., 1989; Hidi & Baird, 1988; Lehman et al., 2007; Mayer & Jackson, 2005).”
Disentangling Curiosity: Dimensionality, Definitions, and Distinctions from Interest in Educational Contexts (2014, background): “The affective and emotional responses associated with interest include increased attention and persistence (Ainley et al. 2002; Lehman et al. 2007) and positive feelings of enjoyment (Hidi 2006; Schiefele 2009; Silvia 2006).”
The Nature of the Refutation Text Effect: An Investigation of Attention Allocation (2010, background): “Kendeou and van den Broek (2007) hypothesized that it is the coactivation and integration processes that allow readers to detect the inconsistencies between their prior knowledge and the scientific explanation.”