Naturally Biased? In Search for Reaction Time Evidence for a Natural Number Bias in Adults.
By Xenia Vamvakoussi, W. Van Dooren, Lieven Verschaffel. 2012
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54e6d01c7f8e1dfdcf8056d5b3acbbb50c541be9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- W. Van Dooren
- Lieven Verschaffel
- Minna M. Hannula-Sormunen
- Erno Lehtinen
- Jake McMullen
- Joris J. van Hoof
- Rianne Janssen
- Stella Vosniadou
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- W. Van Dooren
- Lieven Verschaffel
- Erno Lehtinen
- Minna M. Hannula-Sormunen
- Rianne Janssen
- Jake McMullen
In Statistics and Probability
- Lieven Verschaffel
- W. Van Dooren
- Minna M. Hannula-Sormunen
- Joris J. van Hoof
- Erno Lehtinen
- Jake McMullen
- Rianne Janssen
- Stella Vosniadou
Citations in the corpus
- Student Teachers’ and Experienced Teachers’ Professional Vision of Students’ Understanding of the Rational Number Concept (2020, unknown): “The fraction concept is known to be very challenging, not only for primary school students but also for teachers (Merenluoto and Lehtinen 2004) and for adults in general (Obersteiner et al. 2013; Vamvakoussi et al. 2012; Van Dooren et al. 2015); hence, teaching fractions offers a context for studyin”
- Spontaneous Focusing on Quantitative Relations in the Development of Children's Fraction Knowledge (2014, background): “A number of studies show that often students and adults are biased toward using natural number concepts when reasoning about fraction magnitudes (Obersteiner et al., 2013; Vamvakoussi et al., 2012).”
- Inhibiting natural knowledge in fourth graders: towards a comprehensive test instrument (2015, background): “71 * 3 will result in an outcome larger than 3 (Hasemann 1981; Vamvakoussi et al. 2012).”