Institutional Logics in the Study of Organizations: The Social Construction of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance
By Marc Orlitzky. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2011
160 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/525893b43179878e3304c5927841b28ff7e864f6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Timo Busch
- Patrick Velte
- Jean‐Pascal Gond
- Ante Glavas
- Moinak Maiti
- V. Swaen
- Assâad El akremi
- N. Babu
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Jean‐Pascal Gond
- V. Swaen
- Assâad El akremi
- Ante Glavas
- Patrick Velte
- Moinak Maiti
- N. Babu
- Timo Busch
In Strategy and Management
- Timo Busch
- Jean‐Pascal Gond
- Patrick Velte
- Moinak Maiti
- Ante Glavas
- Weiqiang Tan
- V. Swaen
- Assâad El akremi
Citations in the corpus
- Meta-analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a literature review (2021, background): “Orlitzky (2011) referred to 388 CSR studies and stressed that, in comparison to different publication outlets, economics journals concentrate on positive significant results.”
- Shareholder Wealth Maximization and Social Welfare: A Utilitarian Critique (2013, background): “…on corporate social performance (CSP) and financial performance (FP) find a positive link (Margolis & Walsh, 2003; Orlitzky, Schmidt, & Rynes, 2003; Orlitzky, 2011), 8 increasing our confidence that at least some of the discretionary, socially minded activities engaged in by firms have positive…”
- The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes (2014, background): “As can be seen from this brief review of CSR, not only are there different approaches but also different logics (Orlitzky, 2011).”
- Operational Productivity, Corporate Social Performance, Financial Performance, and Risk in Manufacturing Firms (2016, background): “For example, variables considered include consumer moral values (Schuler and Cording 2006), stakeholder management strategy (Mattingly and Berman 2006), institutional logics (Orlitzky 2011), and media publicity (Zyglidopoulos et al. 2012), among others.”
- Is ESG the succeeding risk factor? (2020, background): “Then the studies by Orlitzky (2011); Borgers et al. (2013); Orlitzky (2013); Reynolds (2014) questions about the measurability and durability aspect of the ESG.”
- Sustainable Development and Financial Markets (2016, background): “…within the literature on the business case for sustainability, ranging from reverse causality (McGuire, Sundgren, & Schneeweis, 1988; Orlitzky, Schmidt, & Rynes, 2003) to the influence of researcher ideology (Orlitzky, 2011) to problematic research designs (McWilliams, Siegel, & Teoh, 1999).”
- The Signaling Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Economies (2016, background): “Although Margolis et al. (2009) document a small but positive relationship between CSR and financial performance, Orlitzky (2011) finds that mixed results are derived from the distinct training of different disciplines.”
- The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review (2017, methodology): “This bias emerges from a prior meta-analysis of the CSR–financial performance relationship (Orlitzky, 2011).”
- A Review of the Nonmarket Strategy Literature (2016, unknown): “…CSR and organizational outcomes depends on social construction within different institutional contexts, including different forms of communicating performance in different countries and the publication outlet where the evidence on performance is published (Maignan & Ralston, 2002; Orlitzky, 2011).”
- Corporate Social Responsibility, Noise, and Stock Market Volatility (2012, background): “Like the second group of socially conscious investors, this third group of investors, who can be considered believers in instrumental stakeholder theory (Jones, 1995; Orlitzky, 2011), are likely to buy shares of companies that are perceived to be high in CSR.”