Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?
By Jeffrey D. Karpicke, Andrew C. Butler, H. Roediger III. Memory, 2009
734 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5215ab56085fa6c7594854a4e7d3e4a4667e25b7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Richard E. Mayer
- Logan Fiorella
- Tamara van Gog
- Olusola O. Adesope
- Jeffrey D. Karpicke
- Michelle L. Rivers
- John Dunlosky
- John Sweller
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Richard E. Mayer
- Tamara van Gog
- Logan Fiorella
- Michelle L. Rivers
- John Sweller
- Olusola O. Adesope
- Jeffrey D. Karpicke
- John Dunlosky
Citations in the corpus
- Not New, but Nearly Forgotten: the Testing Effect Decreases or even Disappears as the Complexity of Learning Materials Increases (2015, background): “Although these findings might also simply reflect students’ confidence in restudy as an effective learning method (see, e.g., Karpicke et al. 2009; Kornell and Son 2009), it is also likely that they underscore students’ overconfidence after restudy due to feelings of high familiarity or low…”
- Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning (2016, background): “Indeed, other research suggests that, despite its benefits, many students do not choose to use self-testing when studying for courses and instead rely on suboptimal strategies such as rereading Karpicke et al. (2009).”
- Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. (2011, background): “In another survey on study habits, Karpicke, Butler, and Roediger (2009) asked college students to list their most commonly used study habits (rather than asking directly if they used testing, as in the Kornell and Bjork (2007) survey).”
- When Is Practice Testing Most Effective for Improving the Durability and Efficiency of Student Learning? (2012, background): “Furthermore, outcomes of recent survey studies suggest that students underuse selftesting during self-regulated learning (e.g., Karpicke et al. 2009; Kornell and Bjork 2007).”
- Retrieval-Based Learning: A Perspective for Enhancing Meaningful Learning (2012, positive): “Karpicke, Butler, and Roediger (2009) reasoned that students' judgments of learning are partially based on the fluency with which they process material (for review, see Koriat 2007).”
- Retrieval-Based Learning (2012, background): “Returning to the survey of student learning strategies (Karpicke et al., 2009), one might think the results would change if we reworded the survey question.”
- Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. (2013, background): “Such beliefs may explain in part why few students reported the use of self-testing when asked about their strategy use on the openended survey administered by Karpicke et al. (2009).”
- Metacognition About Practice Testing: a Review of Learners’ Beliefs, Monitoring, and Control of Test-Enhanced Learning (2020, methodology): “…manipulations of testing versus restudying (Blunt and Karpicke 2014; Carpenter et al. 2016; Hinze and Rapp 2014; Johnson and Mayer 2009; Kang 2010; Karpicke 2009; Karpicke and Blunt 2011; Karpicke and Roediger 2008; Lechuga et al. 2015; Linderholm et al. 2016; Little and McDaniel 2015; O’Day and…”