Message Properties, Mediating States, and Manipulation Checks: Claims, Evidence, and Data Analysis in Experimental Persuasive Message Effects Research

By Daniel J. O'Keefe. 2003

585 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d87e35cb3abf0732ac5011db693b9da67a42c5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

It’s okay to shoot a character: Moral disengagement in violent video games (2010, background): “reflected later in the response to a question (O’Keefe, 2003).”
The Myth of Gender Cultures: Similarities Outweigh Differences in Men's and Women's Provision of and Responses to Supportive Communication (2004, background): “16As O’Keefe (2003) has recently shown, formal manipulation”
Picking up litter: an application of theory-based communication to influence tourist behaviour in protected areas (2010, background): “Both messages were subjected to manipulation checks (O’Keefe, 2003) to ensure they were communicating what was intended and in both cases, the messages were found to be consistent with the theoretical basis that informed them.”
The Effects of Argument Quality and Involvement Type on Attitude Formation and Attitude Change: A Test of Dual-Process and Social Judgment Predictions (2007, background): “Boomerang findings are reported sporadically in the literature (e.g., Na, 1999;”
How consumers' values influence responses to male and female gender role stereotyping in advertising (2018, background): “The experimental design as explained above was developed to create variation in perceived stereotypical portrayal and the cultural values (O’Keefe 2003).”
Media Effects: Theory and Research. (2016, background): “For example, in experiments investigating the differential effects of fear-provoking messages, the extent of fearfulness is typically evaluated via pretests or manipulation checks in which subjects’ reactions are observed or surveyed (O'Keefe 2003).”
Creating News Literacy Messages to Enhance Expert Corrections of Misinformation on Twitter (2020, background): “Finally, research suggests that manipulation checks are not necessary when message variations are based on “intrinsic features” (O’Keefe, 2003, p. 251).”
A Meta-Analysis of the ELM's Argument Quality × Processing Type Predictions (2015, background): “One possible explanation for this finding is that communication researchers are more likely to focus on message aspects of argument quality (O’Keefe, 2003).”
On a Scale of State Empathy During Message Processing (2010, background): “It is more of a [perceived] message property, rather than a psychological state that mediates the message effects (O’Keefe, 2003).”
Alcohol's Getting a Bit More Social: When Alcohol Marketing Messages on Facebook Increase Young Adults’ Intentions to Imbibe (2015, background): “As such, manipulation checks are not required (see O’Keefe, 2003).”