Emily K. Vraga

Sociology and Political Science · 2010–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 13 papers; trusts 45 researchers and is trusted by 13 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 185 citations into it; #3,999 of 22,756 by trust here, #3,788 by citations
• Communication — 92 citations into it; #611 of 3,460 by trust here, #656 by citations
• Artificial Intelligence — 30 citations into it; #11,292 of 35,345 by trust here, #13,544 by citations
• Literature and Literary Theory — 30 citations into it
• Statistical and Nonlinear Physics — 23 citations into it; #9,305 of 10,127 by trust here, #7,402 by citations
• Political Science and International Relations — 19 citations into it
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 17 citations into it
• Health — 16 citations into it

Whom Emily K. Vraga trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Andrew F. Hayes
2. Emily A. Thorson
3. Brendan Nyhan
4. Leticia Bode
5. Nathan Walter
6. John Cook
7. Andy Field
8. Jason Reifler
9. Andrew J. Flanagin
10. Jimmeka J. Guillory

Who trusts Emily K. Vraga overall

1. Leticia Bode
2. Elmie Nekmat
3. J. Roozenbeek
4. Sumitra Badrinathan
5. Nathan Walter
6. Hye Kyung Kim
7. Joanne M. Miller
8. S. van der Linden
9. Ashley Muddiman
10. Sojung Claire Kim

Papers from Emily K. Vraga's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Emily K. Vraga trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
2. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
3. The case for motivated reasoning.
4. Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation
5. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach
6. In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media
7. The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence
8. Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence (PLoS ONE)
9. Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence
10. Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media (Political Behavior)

Their papers

• In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media (2015) — 558 citations
• Defining Misinformation and Understanding its Bounded Nature: Using Expertise and Evidence for Describing Misinformation (2020) — 387 citations
• Testing Logic-based and Humor-based Corrections for Science, Health, and Political Misinformation on Social Media (2019) — 118 citations
• Credibility in Context: How Uncivil Online Commentary Affects News Credibility (2010) — 186 citations
• Testing the Effectiveness of Correction Placement and Type on Instagram (2020) — 121 citations
• A first look at COVID-19 information and misinformation sharing on Twitter (2020) — 317 citations
• See Something, Say Something: Correction of Global Health Misinformation on Social Media (2018) — 666 citations
• Does Engagement in Advocacy Hurt the Credibility of Scientists? Results from a Randomized National Survey Experiment (2017) — 168 citations
• Correction Experiences on Social Media During COVID-19 (2021) — 89 citations
• The Debunking Handbook 2020 (2020) — 188 citations
• Theorizing News Literacy Behaviors (2020) — 109 citations
• Creating News Literacy Messages to Enhance Expert Corrections of Misinformation on Twitter (2020) — 139 citations
• A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Measuring News Media Literacy (2015) — 102 citations