The Effects of Argument Quality and Involvement Type on Attitude Formation and Attitude Change: A Test of Dual-Process and Social Judgment Predictions

By Hee Sun Park, Timothy R. Levine, Catherine Y. Kingsley Westerman, Tierney Orfgen, Sarah Foregger. 2007

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35cda119bd5d0478fb8e0dcfa67898ef43b49000

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. René Weber
2. Christopher J. Carpenter
3. Hee Sun Park
4. Timothy R. Levine
5. Craig R. Hullett
6. Kisang Ryu
7. S. Jang

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Joshua M. Parcha
2. Catherine Y. Kingsley Westerman
3. René Weber
4. Christopher J. Carpenter

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Timothy R. Levine
2. Joshua M. Parcha
3. Catherine Y. Kingsley Westerman
4. René Weber
5. Christopher J. Carpenter
6. Hee Sun Park
7. Craig R. Hullett
8. Kisang Ryu

Citations in the corpus

• How Corporate Social Advocacy Affects Attitude Change Toward Controversial Social Issues (2020, methodology): “ORI is commonly examined in ELM studies (Johnson & Eagly, 1989; Park et al., 2007).”
• A Communication Researchers' Guide to Null Hypothesis Significance Testing and Alternatives. (2008, methodology): “Thus, applied to our example, if the conservative strategy is applied to the Park et al. (2007) data, the result would be nonsignificant.”
• A Meta-Analysis of the ELM's Argument Quality × Processing Type Predictions (2015, background): “The ELM was described most fully in Petty and Cacioppo’s seminal 1986 monograph. At the core of the model is the elaboration continuum that ranges from no cognitive elaboration of the issues relevant to the attitude object in the persuasive message to completely elaborating all of the issue-relevant”