The Nature of Children's Stereotypes of Popularity

By Kathryn M. LaFontana, Antonius H. N. Cillessen. 2001

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46832f9bbc3a647fc65f1650875de545ff9095af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Antonius H. N. Cillessen
2. Philip C. Rodkin
3. T. Farmer
4. E. H. de Bruyn
5. Marlene J. Sandstrom
6. E. V. Hodges
7. P. Hawley
8. Christina Salmivalli

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Antonius H. N. Cillessen
2. Philip C. Rodkin
3. T. Farmer
4. P. Hawley
5. E. H. de Bruyn
6. E. Andreou
7. Gordon Whitehead
8. Christina Salmivalli

In Social Psychology

1. Antonius H. N. Cillessen
2. Philip C. Rodkin
3. T. Farmer
4. E. H. de Bruyn
5. Marlene J. Sandstrom
6. P. Hawley
7. E. V. Hodges
8. Christina Salmivalli

Citations in the corpus

• Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment (2006, background): “, on the other hand, are viewed by peers as exhibiting dominant and aggressive tendencies in addition to prosocial ones (e.g., LaFontana & Cillessen, 1998, 2002; Lease, Kennedy, & Axelrod, 2002; Parkhurst & Hopmeyer, 1998).”
• Bullies and Victims in the Peer Ecology: Four Questions for Psychologists and School Professionals (2003, background): “LaFontana and Cillessen (1998) used hypothetical picturestories to assess how fourth and fifth graders explained the actions of main characters described as either popular, unpopular, or neither popular nor unpopular (i.e., neutral-popular).”
• Prosocial and Coercive Configurations of Resource Control in Early Adolescence: A Case for the Well-Adapted Machiavellian (2003, background): “These bistrategic children may not be the most liked (i.e., they may not be the most popular in a sociometric sense), but they may be perceived by the group to be the most popular (e.g., perceived popularity; LaFontana & Cillessen, 1998; Parkhurst & Hopmeyer, 1998).”
• Heterogeneity of popular boys: antisocial and prosocial configurations. (2000, background): “LaFontana and Cillessen (1998) used hypothetical vignettes to assess how fourth and fifth graders explained the actions of popular, unpopular, and neutral-popular protagonists.”
• Developmental Changes in the Priority of Perceived Status in Childhood and Adolescence. (2010, unknown): “There is, however, a complex relationship between perceived status and pro-social behavior in early adolescence (LaFontana & Cillessen, 1998, 2002; Lease, Kennedy, & Axelrod, 2002; Merten, 1997; Parkhurst & Hopmeyer, 1998).”
• Popularity in Early Adolescence: Prosocial and Antisocial Subtypes (2006, background): “LaFontana and Cillessen (1998) demonstrated that hypothetically perceived popular peers were described as displaying hostile intentions more than neutral peers.”