Key Ideas: What are they and how can they help us understand how people view proof?
By M. Raman. 2003
174 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Theoretical Computer Science, Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4623e507416f2fd82d66b2d5508b32ae94680cfb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Keith Weber
- Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos
- Timothy Fukawa-Connelly
- K. Lew
- Matthew Inglis
- Lara Alcock
- Francesca Morselli
- Fulvia Furinghetti
In Theoretical Computer Science
- Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos
- Timothy Fukawa-Connelly
- Keith Weber
- K. Lew
- Matthew Inglis
- Lara Alcock
- Francesca Morselli
- Fulvia Furinghetti
In Philosophy
Citations in the corpus
- Lectures in Advanced Mathematics: Why Students Might Not Understand What the Mathematics Professor Is Trying to Convey. (2016, background): “(See Raman, 2003, for a similar analysis and potential epistemological benefits of such proofs).”
- An assessment model for proof comprehension in undergraduate mathematics (2011, unknown): “…also ask the student to justify why this choice of M was appropriate or to present them with a poor choice of M and ask why the proof would not work in that case. mathematics educators (e.g., Raman, 2003) and mathematicians (e.g., Thurston, 1994) argue is important for developing understanding.”