Students' notetaking: the effects of teacher immediacy and clarity
By B. Titsworth. 2004
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43d72f46830a7bc06c068139f5a56ac931ef2fa4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Social Psychology
- Alan K. Goodboy
- Joseph P. Mazer
- San Bolkan
- Scott Titsworth
- D. Kelsey
- Jeffrey H. Kuznekoff
- S. Myers
- K. Rocca
Citations in the corpus
- The Effect of Teacher Confirmation on Student Communication and Learning Outcomes (2008, methodology): “Each lecture was approximately 15 minutes in length, which coincides with previous experimental research using live lecture manipulations (Chesebro, 2003; Comstock, Rowell, & Bowers, 1995; Titsworth, 2004).”
- Two Meta-analyses Exploring the Relationship between Teacher Clarity and Student Learning (2015, background): “In other research, clarity cues (e.g., organizational cues; Titsworth, 2004) or clarity behavioral clusters (e.”
- The Impact of Mobile Phone Usage on Student Learning (2013, background): “Scholars have previously examined the number of details from the lecture that are also contained in the students’ notes (see Titsworth & Kiewra, 2004; Titsworth, 2004).”
- Instructor Clarity and Student Motivation: Academic Performance as A Product of Students’ Ability and Motivation to Process Instructional Material (2016, background): “…(Chesebro & McCroskey, 2001) and has been associated positively with students’ emotional and cognitive interest (Mazer, 2013), detailed and organized note taking (Titsworth, 2004; Titsworth & Kiewra, 2004), and their reports of affective and cognitive learning (Titsworth & Mazer, 2010).”