Transfer of Training: A Review and New Insights

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Transfer of Training: What Really Matters (2011, background): “…several authors have reviewed and summarized the extant literature (for example, Baldwin et al., 2009; Blume et al., 2010; Burke & Hutchins, 2007; Cheng & Hampson, 2008; Cheng & Ho, 2001; Merriam & Leahy, 2005), conclusions regarding the key components of transfer remain somewhat ambivalent.”
Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review (2010, background): “In addition, although previous qualitative reviews have indicated mixed support for the relationship between work environment and transfer (e.g., Cheng & Hampson, 2008), we found meaningful, nonzero correlation between work environment and transfer.”
Approaches for Organizational Learning: A Literature Review (2018, background): “As they support dissemination of, for instance, process and technical knowledge (Chau, Maurer, & Melnik, 2003; Cheng & Hampson, 2008), training helps in transferring knowledge of both tacit knowledge (socialization) and explicit knowledge (internalization) to individuals.”
The effects of perceived organizational support and job satisfaction on transfer of training (2015, background): “Researchers have argued that both job satisfaction and POS are important factors that could enhance transfer of training in the workplace (see Baldwin and Ford, 1988; Cheng and Hampson, 2008; Elangovan and Karakowsky, 1999; Thayer and Teachout, 1995).”